Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Whatever else this amendment may be about, it is also about which religion or religious view shall be the law of our state. That is precisely what the Founders sought to avoid and what we in this state have avoided for 157 years."

Since the law has for 157 years prohibited same-sex marriage, how can re-affirmation of that principle be considered a change from prior practice? And aren't they demanding that the law be changed to conform to THEIR religious views? Both logic and facts are in short supply in this article.
12 posted on 03/22/2006 3:10:53 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle
Since the law has for 157 years prohibited same-sex marriage, how can re-affirmation of that principle be considered a change from prior practice?

Well, you know Hegelians. The universe is in a constant state of teleological flux until it reaches the "omega point" at which point "truth" will finally be arrived at. Until then, everything is constantly changing.

169 posted on 03/24/2006 7:27:38 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Chazzaq! Chazzaq! Vanitchazzeq!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson