Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rick Deckard
BS, they are doing this for the money they get out of it. They don't care if you have a license except that they are able to impound someone's car and auction it off.

Originally a license was for revenue only, in most states, with no test required.

As for insurance, the government is stomping all over your constitutional rights when they require us to have insurance. Driving is NOT a priviledge, but one of the unenumerated rights mentioned in the constitution.

The priviledge BS is spouted off by the government so they can push onerous regulations and "fees"(read taxes) on us at will!

12 posted on 03/22/2006 2:35:57 PM PST by calex59 (seeing the light shouldn't make you go blind and, BTW, Stå sammen med danskerne !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: calex59

Should driving on public roads be an unregulated free-for-all?


15 posted on 03/22/2006 2:45:24 PM PST by Rick Deckard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: calex59
Driving is one of those rights, like the right the lazy have to be fed and housed at our expense and the right junkies have to have us pay for their methadone and the right those who don't care for their health have to be treated and medicated?

We pay for the roads. I think we get to lay down some requirements about who drives on them. I think tolls would be better, but licenses ain't so bad.

What's your proposal?

16 posted on 03/22/2006 3:17:29 PM PST by Mad Dawg (If you find yourself in a fair fight, you did not prepare properly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson