If this pinhead is trying to claim that there's some kind of rigorous censorship of Rachel Corrie's story, it's BS. She been in the news over and over. But none of the victims of PLO terrorism have been in the news nearly as much; they are only in the news once - when they are blown to bits by Rachel Corrie's buddies. Then, unlike Rachel Corrie, they are forgotten.
"Why is it that the eloquent words of an American radical could not be heard in this country"
Can't anyone put on this play? Or are the writers claiming money need be paid to them?
"If this pinhead is trying to claim that there's some kind of rigorous censorship of Rachel Corrie's story, it's BS."
It's SOP Left-wing faux-censorship victimization. The assumption becomes a mantra.