Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nightdriver
I started subscribing to The New American while the Clintons were in the White House. Say what you will, but they were at least 6 months ahead of the MSM on many stories, and others never got a column inch from the likes of the NYT.

One thing I have noticed, is that their magazine takes one stance: that which is lawful under the Constitution.

Read that, then go back and read an issue or two of TNA.

You will find that despite offending your sensibilities on occasion, they have a good track record for being right.

I have seen no evidence of racism of any stripe, either.

What I really want to know is why so many here are willing one minute to refute chapter and verse what the MSM says, and the next minute they are clamoring to get on the Dino-Media bandwagon, especially when it comes to smearing a Conservative group?

79 posted on 03/22/2006 9:18:53 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
What I really want to know is why so many here are willing one minute to refute chapter and verse what the MSM says, and the next minute they are clamoring to get on the Dino-Media bandwagon, especially when it comes to smearing a Conservative group?

The fish don't know they're wet, that's why!

85 posted on 03/22/2006 9:49:35 AM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson