Your hysterics both undermine your position, and belie your motivations. Project much?
Also; the straw-man argument in reference to the Chi-Coms doesn't hold water. Most here are equally opposed to their involvement in strategic infrastructure, security enterprises, and defense technology. Try a new tack. You're headed for the rocks again.
I'm busting a gut over that one!
Most of the huff-and-puffers on this site weren't even aware of COSCO's role in 14 ports on the West Coast, or that it had been in that role for nearly ten years!
You guys hide behind every transparently phony excuse you can think of.
One of your fellow travelers gave the game away in a post up thread.
The reason is we've all decided there should be linkage, and people who have been quietly pro-Chi-com, or maybe even LOUDLY pro-Chi-com like Barbara Boxer, the Clintons, and the assorted Socialist International crowd in Congress, have been pretty noisy about not peddling this stuff to the Arabs.
Your little buddy Duncan Hunter has not, as far as I know, publicly opposed Chi-com ownership of the same assets. All those years he was supposedly a solid Conservative, and there he goes and jumps the reservation where all of us could see it on this Dubai deal. Denny Hastert should be taking some action there as soon as possible.