To: Oztrich Boy
Compared to spending eternity in a Heaven filled with gloating True Christians, it looks like another reason to Accept Darwin
This is the legacy of Darwinism. Many people, in their acceptance of a scientific theory which refutes many of the things God did, will find themselves unable to have any faith in Him whatsoever.
No one is going to get to heaven and see God throwing people who accepted evolution out of heaven. But those aren't the people I'm talking. What we will see in heaven is God throwing out the ones who refused to believe in Him because they felt that science had proven Christianity was a myth. And it's not going to be a pretty thing to see, either.
42 posted on
03/21/2006 10:43:48 AM PST by
JamesP81
To: JamesP81
Atheism started synonymously with the first conman shaman, not with Darwin.
44 posted on
03/21/2006 11:07:31 AM PST by
balrog666
(Irrational beliefs inspire irrational posts.)
To: JamesP81
"This is the legacy of Darwinism. Many people, in their acceptance of a scientific theory which refutes many of the things God did, will find themselves unable to have any faith in Him whatsoever."
The things that were alleged to have been done by God, you mean.
"What we will see in heaven is God throwing out the ones who refused to believe in Him because they felt that science had proven Christianity was a myth. And it's not going to be a pretty thing to see, either."
What do you think he will do to those who refused to use their brains and rejected the evidence available from the physical Creation?
45 posted on
03/21/2006 11:20:59 AM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: JamesP81
You did not answer my question in #36...so I'll try a different approach.
"What we will see in heaven is God throwing out the ones who refused to believe in Him because they felt that science had proven Christianity was a myth."
So why would you advocate putting the teaching of Christianity in the hands of science by forcing science teachers to discuss it in a science classroom?
You're creating an atmosphere conducive to lowering Creation to a myth to be discussed alongside other myths in a science classroom, and in teaching ID (the idea that there was some unknown intelligent designer behind Creation) you cast a doubt on who the Creator is!
I don't get it.
148 posted on
03/21/2006 7:47:17 PM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson