Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
I have a very legitimate criticism of George Bush because at one of his State of the Union Addresses, his first theme he raised was aid to Africa, not a crucial issue like this!

The SOTU address is a laundry list of accomplishments and proposals. Bush did mention SS reform in his address and others before it. The order it comes in the speech is irrelevant and frankly, so is the importance of these speeches, save for exceptions like Bush's SOTU address after 9/11.

Bush and Congress can change this "mandatory spending" crap if they both had their priotities focused on the USA, and it is the POTUS's job to get Congress focused. For the future of the nation, it must be addressed.

Bush has done everything possible to make entitlement reform a major issue. It is not called the "third rail of American politics" for nothing. The Dems are not cooperating. Rather, they are demagoging the issue to achieve a political advantage. The say the Reps want to cut the benefits of the elderly and the poor. You have America's most powerful lobbying group, AARP, spending huge amounts of money to defeat such reform. As an AARP member, I have been furious about the propaganda they have been spewing out and won't renew my membership.

During Bush's tenure, he has spent at a clip that exceeds all modern day presidents. This spending does not jive with nation that has the trends in social welfare spending and demographics that we have. Unless this is changed, we will not be able to defend our nation, As it is, the trends in Defense spending are sliding down while social welfare spending is soaring, now accounting for 64.5% of all spending.

Defense spending has been increasing over the 5 years of the Bush administration, even without the Iraq war. He has been rebuilding the militrary after Clinton gutted it using the so called peace-dividend.

What you don't seem to comprehend is that the WH cannot unilaterally reform the entitlement programs, which are on automatic pilot. Generally, Congress is unwilling to do so because there is a political price to pay. We won't see any reform until after the 2008 elections. Then Congress will be forced to address the problem because the SS "surplus" starts declining in 2008 and in 2017, more money will be spent in benefits than revenue collected. Instead of being a cash cow, SS becomes a liability.

731 posted on 03/21/2006 8:36:42 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
The SOTU is what the POTUS makes of it. If he wants to do his "laundry list" as you say instead of making a news event out of it with bold demands on Congress that make news headlines, then that is a sign of a poor leader.

No, Bush has not done everything possible. As I stated, his new entitlement programs and his expansion of existing social welfare programs makes any attempt to reign in spending seem comical.

Re military spending.....no, the military has not improved. R&D spending is not what it used to be. Major weapon programs like the F-22 and DD(X) have been scaled back or delayed. The military is under pressure to find more ways to scale back in order to pay for more socialism.

Did you miss the announcement that the entire F-117 fleet is to be decommissioned as well as 50% of the B-52 fleet, just to buy four (4) Raptors? Most of the money spent on the DOD is going for logistics, wear and tear, payroll, and other war associated costs, not to make this nation more secure with new modern weapon platforms,
769 posted on 03/21/2006 8:58:48 AM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson