Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newguy357
Obviously not, because it makes it very clear that he was not all that attractive.

Hmmm.....let's see...Adam was the first perfect man...Jesus was the second Adam....and also a perfect man. Somehow I doubt that he was of a flawed appearance in any way.

The scripture you are probably referring to shows how badly he was mangled during his torture and execution. He was hideously disfigured and would have been such a horrible sight to behold that people would hide their eyes to keep from seeing him.

12 posted on 03/21/2006 7:29:03 AM PST by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye

Isaiah 53:2 does not refer to Jesus' appearance after being beaten. That's simply untrue, just like what you're saying about his appearance has no biblical basis. Please read your bible. Or just keep twisting things toward your own ends. History is full of people like you.


17 posted on 03/23/2006 7:52:38 AM PST by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson