To: Cincinatus' Wife
Plaintiffs contend that discrimination is responsible for the fact that more than 90 percent of the region's family public housing units in the mid-1990s were concentrated in areas of the city with disproportionately high numbers of African-Americans and that most holders of housing vouchers also lived in areas that were overwhelmingly black and poor. Read that a couple of times and try to digest the meaning of it. All I can get out of it is that they are claiming that poor black people live where poor black people live.
11 posted on
03/21/2006 3:49:31 AM PST by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Graybeard58
Read that a couple of times and try to digest the meaning of it. All I can get out of it is that they are claiming that poor black people live where poor black people live. And I think the judge is saying that living around black people is undesirable.
To: Graybeard58
It's following the precident of the Brown vs. Board of Education. Public housing is discriminatory because it segregates blacks into racial ghettos. This activist judge likens it to ethnic cleansing. The solution is to mandate that blacks be relocated to middle class neighborhoods just like bussing was orcdered by SCOTUS. HUD needs to appeal this decision ASAP. Just wait until houses in the suburbs get bought by HUD and turned into Section 8 housing and all the problems these lowlifes brign with it.
57 posted on
03/21/2006 5:59:10 AM PST by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson