Replies

How the heck could Fitz have gone looking for a leaker without first proving or finding there was an actionable leak?

Fraud against the American people by accepting money (salaries) for continuing to investigate a non-crime?

I blame the CIA for making a bogus referral, then demanding it be chased. What's Fitz supposed to do, call the CIA a pack of liars, first thing out of the block? He got stuck 'tween a rock and hard spot. If Libby had't (allegedly) mislead investigators, I think the whole case would have run its course with no report.

What's Fitz supposed to do, call the CIA a pack of liars, first thing out of the block?

Was he supposed to almost exclusively go after the White House as if they were a pack of liars? He was given wide ranging authority, he chose a very narrow path.

"I blame the CIA for making a bogus referral, then demanding it be chased. What's Fitz supposed to do, call the CIA a pack of liars, first thing out of the block? He got stuck 'tween a rock and hard spot. If Libby had't (allegedly) mislead investigators, I think the whole case would have run its course with no report."

Have we seen that original referral that was supposedly sent by the CIA? I say supposedly because I am not convinced that someone outside the CIA authored it, talking pointed it or in some manner arranged it.

And do we know if Rockefeller in his esteemed position is a player in all this, being seated on the intel committee sent a request for an investigation separate from the CIA? Now wasn't he the chairman during this time? His memo laying out their premeditated road map to criminalize the Bush presidency just cannot be ignored.

I am sorry that I have to keep asking you questions, and I do appreciate your knowledge, so I thank you in advance for your information.