Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomCalls

This is talking about 'off post' being banned. Not 'on post'.


56 posted on 03/20/2006 8:16:52 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: TalonDJ
This is talking about 'off post' being banned. Not 'on post'.

I'm aware of that -- I thought I made that clear in my comment: "The policy of 'no concealed carry on post' even in those states that allow it has been in place for many many years now. The Joint Chiefs have never overturned that. Why do you think they would overrturn this?"

The point being that they never overturned something wholly under their jurisdiction before, so why would they bother now? Besides, as I said, the JCS does not get involved in things like this. They are a war-fighting structure. Administrative rules like this from a local commander are not what they deal with. Never have been.

59 posted on 03/20/2006 12:24:55 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson