Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58

So soldiers can be trusted with weapons civilians can't have,
but can't be trusted with weapons civilians can have?


10 posted on 03/19/2006 8:33:40 PM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boundless

That's pretty much the standard Army-wide. Honestly, there's a lot of folks in the Army I don't trust with a weapon. Thankfully their jobs don't generally require its use.


69 posted on 03/20/2006 4:22:33 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Boundless

You've never been in the service have you? Generally commanders are very selective in who gets duty that requires being armed, routine training at firing ranges and such, excluded. In addition during training, ammunition is carefully controled. Almost all weapons are stored in the arms room at all times and only checked out when required for specific duties.

I laugh whenever a TV show has a soldier shooting someone with his service weapon while on leave. Cannot happen, you cannot take a military weapon on leave.


72 posted on 03/20/2006 4:49:11 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Boundless

This has me curious too. If you can't trust them with a weapon when off duty how do you just them with one during war time????


89 posted on 03/21/2006 11:12:44 AM PST by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con, American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson