Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
Here's the latest state rankings:

http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank.htm
15 posted on 03/19/2006 6:32:12 PM PST by stm (You can fix a lot of thing s, but you can't fix stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: stm

Thank you - that shows Cali at #46... lowly Georgia (where i can assure you the public schools suck) is #40.


18 posted on 03/19/2006 6:34:54 PM PST by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: stm
Here's the latest state rankings:

Those rankings are suspect. Out of 21 criteria, only 6 are based on student proficiency.

22 posted on 03/19/2006 6:40:28 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: stm
This is the self actualizing method that they use.

Do they rank states according to student's collective GPA?

of course not! that might make sense!

This is how they came to their conclusions:

METHODOLOGY--This fourth Smartest State designation is awarded based on 21 factors chosen from Morgan Quitno’s annual reference book, Education State Rankings, 2005-2006.
Featuring four new factors, this year’s award de-emphasizes spending for public schools and instead measures states based on student achievement, positive outcomes and personal attention from teachers.
(As a result, rankings for this year’s Smartest State Award are not directly comparable to last year’s rankings.)
To calculate the Smartest State rankings, the 21 factors were divided into two groups: those that are “negative” for which a high ranking would be considered bad for a state, and those that are “positive” for which a high ranking would be considered good.
Rates for each of the 21 factors were processed through a formula that measures how a state compares to the national average for a given category.
The positive and negative nature of each factor was taken into account as part of the formula. Once these computations were made, the factors then were assigned equal weights.
These weighted scores then were added together to determine a state’s final score (“SUM” on the table above.)
This way, states are assessed based on how they stack up against the national average.
The end result is that the farther below the national average a state’s education ranking is, the lower (and less smart) it ranks.
The farther above the national average, the higher (and smarter) a state ranks.
This same methodology is used for our annual Healthiest State, Safest and Most Dangerous State and Safest/Dangerous City Awards.

Ooookay.

25 posted on 03/19/2006 6:45:15 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: stm
School Rankings
26 posted on 03/19/2006 6:45:55 PM PST by ThreePuttinDude ()......The Media is not Mainstream, stop calling them that........()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: stm
Next time try:

<a href="http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank.htm"> http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank.htm</a>

And it will come out looking like this:

http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank.htm

45 posted on 03/19/2006 9:08:58 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: stm

Virginia at #7--Highest ranking red state


51 posted on 03/20/2006 4:30:21 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson