Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maine-iac7
Are you saying that because there was not a scripture advocating the
inquisition that killed/slaughtered, staked, burned, hung-drawn and
quartered - that it must not have happened? OR must not have been
perpetrated by Christians - ordered by Popes?


This is what happens when pretend-Christians don't read "the manual"
or did read it and decided to do just the opposite.

Besides awaiting the development of the printing press, there was
a reason that The Bible was kept in such short supply so that
even Catholic priest had trouble accessing one.
That was one reason Luther got rolling...he actually got hold of one
and really read it. And what he found didn't match what he saw
and heard when he'd visited Rome.
(I'm not bashing Catholics...just saying the Church organization
seriously went off the rails as an organization as far as trying to
follow what was in the New Testament)
34 posted on 03/20/2006 6:48:19 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: VOA

IIRC, Martin Luther, after he had read the Scriptures (which apparently were chained to the altar in certain Churches - since only the elite Priests could - in some instances - read them, they got to "interpret" them as they saw fit... or to advance their agendas.) he confronted the establishment elite of the Roman Church, and soon found himself under a "Holy Roman Fatwah" being hunted down like an animal.

Had he not been able to hide out in a freind's remote mountain castle, he probably would not have lasted long.

After Luther's open Gospel theory met the Guttenburg press, the Bible became available in the "people's language", so that the priests were no longer able to manipulate the populations and governments with their "creative interpretations" of it.

Sort of like our current "Law", always written in convoluted "Legaleze", and Lawyers/Judges, wouldn't you say?

The political dominance of the RCC went into decline after that, and people began converting to Christianity because they WANTED to, not just to keep themselves and their Families from being tortured and/or killed.

From my admittedly limited reading of History, for a while there around the various Crusades, there seems to have been precious little distinction in terms of how people were treated - especially dissidents from "the Faith" - between Muhummedean and "Christian".

People who wanted to live out their lives to a natural conclusion worshipped whatever or whoever the guy holding the sword over your neck did.


36 posted on 03/20/2006 7:50:49 AM PST by Uncle Jaque (Club Freedom; Dues: Vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson