Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wyattearp
Wikipedia for one.
10 posted on 03/19/2006 4:18:34 PM PST by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: tomzz

LOL. Wikipedia is NOT a scientific journal. Thanks for the laugh, though.


11 posted on 03/19/2006 4:22:01 PM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tomzz

Your Wikipedia link contained an entire section discussing the creationist misappropriation of "macroevolution":


Creationism

Though the details of macroevolution are debated within the scientific community, it is widely accepted. Macroevolution is largely disputed by many creationism and intelligent design advocates. Generally speaking, these groups differentiate between microevolution and macroevolution, asserting that the former is an undeniably observable phenomenon, but that the latter is not.


62 posted on 03/20/2006 11:20:09 AM PST by gomaaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson