Actually you cite a perfect example of the homosexualization of society by judicial fiat! A leftist victory that had nothing to do with equal rights. LOL The case had nothing to do with homosexual discrimination <----(leftist propaganda) and everything to do with local government (society) having the authority to decide which activities (not which individuals) are unhealthy and or harmful and as such merit penalty e.g. reckless driving and sodomy.
The leftist decision cited foriegn law to support overriding US common law and legislative law as to what is considered unhealthy and or harmful activity...
Look for Lawrence to be kicked to the curb in the furure...
For whom is reckless driving LEGAL?
You are missing the big point. You cannot make something legal for one group and illegal for another. Oral and anal sex was LEGAL for heterosexuals, and ILLEGAL for homosexuals. So it wasnt government deciding on an activity that was illegal, it was just that a certain group of the population was not permitted to perform the same acts. That, my friend, by definition is discrimination.