Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bybybill; misterrob
There it went, why should we have each state writing different laws

Because the states are not the federal government, they are closer to the people than the federal government therefore the people have a more direct voice with the state.

If you want the federal government to run everything, you do not want the constitutional republic that was set forth by our forefathers.

In fact, when you look at the supporters of this bill you will see it is just another exercise of the corporatist fascist state that is burgeoning under the "free trade" system established by Bill Clinton.
10 posted on 03/18/2006 8:01:29 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: hedgetrimmer

Where do you get off making the assumption that I want the federal government to run everything? And this "corporate fascist" state crap plays real well with the rest of the "No Blood For Oil" crowd. Try it with them.

Might even impress someone.....


13 posted on 03/18/2006 8:05:36 PM PST by misterrob (Islam is a hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: hedgetrimmer

HUH, do you really think we would be better off with 50 different sets of rules for food safety? Do you think that would make the food safer (how) or more affordable(how)?


14 posted on 03/18/2006 8:05:47 PM PST by bybybill (If the Rats win, we loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: hedgetrimmer

That's nonsense, this is a proper federal issue. This definately deals with interstate commerce and the feds can regulate. It will lead to lower prices. If California and Utah have different labeling standards, then it costs more for the consumer because it costs more for the company to implement both labeling/safety requirements. If your position is that the feds should not be involved, then you also think that feds should not have a say in the labeling of drugs, OTC or otherwise. That is an insane position to hold.


15 posted on 03/18/2006 8:06:12 PM PST by jf55510
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: hedgetrimmer
Because the states are not the federal government, they are closer to the people than the federal government therefore the people have a more direct voice with the state.

Our state took in lead glazed cups that couldn't be sold in California, thank you very much. The sticker had teeny tiny print, stating such and saying they contain toxic chemicles that cause birth defects and other stuff.

I took them to a cashier and asked about them, and they gave me the phone number of their corporate office if I wanted to ask them questions. The cashier also said that sometimes things labeled that way don't get individual stickers at all. The box will state it on the outside and the consumer never sees the box.

I want consistency. Used to be when kids tested positive for lead poisioning it was because of lead based paint. Well, its on the rise again, but this time it isn't the paint. They are injesting it in other items.

23 posted on 03/18/2006 8:23:31 PM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson