Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Darancette
I won't believe Iran has a bomb until they test one. The one thing worse that having no nukes is not having enough nukes.

Unless, of course, one isn't following a policy of MAD, but instead repetively muttering 'Allah, Achbar', perceives the road to glory is paved in their immediate work, and then, even a test might not be operationally best deployed as a demonstration, rather, their best demonstration might be in a destructive test on a foreign target.

When people were concerned about WMD fabrication processes having advanced into the 21st century, they were also concerned with modern logistics and manufacturing just-in-time methods being used in compartmentalized fashions making a response that less likely for countering such a threat with success.

47 posted on 03/18/2006 6:58:58 PM PST by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Cvengr
Unless, of course, one isn't following a policy of MAD, perceives the road to glory is paved in their immediate work, and then, even a test might not be operationally best deployed as a demonstration, rather, their best demonstration might be in a destructive test on a foreign target.

If the Iranians do that the best result Iran can hope for is that the device when triggered goes "Click" otherwise there will not be enough virgins for all of the dead.

49 posted on 03/18/2006 7:11:17 PM PST by Mike Darancette (In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson