[goldstategop]

No, the point is if there is a benefit to the property, then of course the owners should pay for it. Its the reverse of having property owners pay for things that have no clear relationship to their property. In the latter situation, society as a whole ought to properly bear the costs.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

[FairOpinion]

Roads benefit everyone, NOT just the property owners.

The socialists are the ones who want the property owners to subsidize everyone, why do you think CA had the Prop. 13 revolt?

If it's a road, pay for it with gas taxes.