Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EGPWS

I just took the time to look up the engine on both the P-40 and the P-39. Yep the "wonderfull" Allison V-1710 powered both the P-39 and the P-40. The P-40 did benefit from the installation of a lower powered Merlin, around 1300hp, however the inprovement was very slight. The weight per horsepower for both the P-40 and the P-39 was about the same.

As a further sidenote the P-38 was also powered by a variant of the V-1710 engine. The P-38 however had supercgharging which would explain why the P-38 had such a stellar record versus the somewhat lacklaster performance of the P-39 and P-40 aircraft.

A final comment, I seem to recall reading soomewhere that the Luftwaffe pilots where somewhat wary of tangling with the P-40s at low altitude in North Africa as the performance of the P-40 was almost as good as the Me-109s.

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


1,930 posted on 03/18/2006 4:45:01 PM PST by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1827 | View Replies ]


To: alfa6
As a further sidenote the P-38 was also powered by a variant of the V-1710 engine. The P-38 however had supercgharging which would explain why the P-38 had such a stellar record versus the somewhat lacklaster performance of the P-39 and P-40 aircraft.

It never happened my FRiend, for Kelly Johnson insisted that the RR Merlin be a part of the P-38 and it was denied politically for it was promoted that an American engine be used instead of the venerable Merlin.

The P-38 however toted a (new for the time) turbo charger but it was found to be plagued with issues that made the P-38 a more formidable fighter at low altitude, thus it's claim to fame came about in the Pacific and not in Europe.

2,009 posted on 03/18/2006 5:13:37 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1930 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson