Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War Veterans Return Home To Custody Battles
The Indy Channel ^ | March 17, 2006 | AP

Posted on 03/17/2006 9:54:54 AM PST by Abathar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Centurion2000

47


41 posted on 03/17/2006 11:57:37 AM PST by PreviouslyA-Lurker (...where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. 2 Corinthians 3:16-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC
incongruent with having a family.

Except we aren't talking about all military, are we? We are talking about military folks who were either 1)never married (which is detrimental to having a healthy family) or 2) divorced (which means the family that they had wasn't very healthy).

So I'll agree that a person with an unhealty family situation, who happens to be in the military, may not be the ideal parent.

And now I'm out of here for a good while, but if you want to continue, I'll be happy to pick it back up when I return to the computer.

42 posted on 03/17/2006 11:58:46 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar

So, for the sake of argument, the man who leaves the US in service to his country, in good faith, and has a wife left at home who decides for whatever reason, that she's had enough and files for divorce, should then be penalized BY the goevernment which he serves for his choice to serve our country by losing custody of his kids as well??


43 posted on 03/17/2006 12:00:09 PM PST by StarCMC (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing...thank you Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
I think that it is probably healthier for the child to not suddenly have to go from living with her father to living with her mother via joint custody.

So, you prefer the alternative, which is being raised by one parent and excluding the other?

44 posted on 03/17/2006 12:05:43 PM PST by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PreviouslyA-Lurker

And which branch were you in?


45 posted on 03/17/2006 12:14:03 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Islam's true face: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J169127BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

I was never in the military and I'm too old to go in now (if they would even want me).


46 posted on 03/17/2006 12:16:08 PM PST by PreviouslyA-Lurker (...where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. 2 Corinthians 3:16-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth

Actually it is the ex-wife.


47 posted on 03/17/2006 12:17:12 PM PST by PreviouslyA-Lurker (...where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. 2 Corinthians 3:16-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Be sure to work to keep that judge from being re-elected.


48 posted on 03/17/2006 12:20:42 PM PST by PreviouslyA-Lurker (...where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. 2 Corinthians 3:16-18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Thanks for the discussion. FRegards.


49 posted on 03/17/2006 12:45:15 PM PST by StarCMC (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing...thank you Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC

If the divorce happens after he's already deployed (or committed), that's certainly a reasonable exception to that I said. But if he's already separated and still goes off for an extended time, he should expect less of a relationship. I respect his sacrifice, and he certainly shouldn't lose all his time with his kids, but it's probably in the best interest of the kids to remain with their mother if they've been with her full-time for a year.


50 posted on 03/17/2006 12:51:04 PM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar

I guess I just disagree. If dad has to be gone for a while -- or mom -- because of their service, kids understand that. But to deny custody -- even in partiality -- when they return is unfair to both the child AND the parent. The government is denying the returning parent an opportunity for relationship. And FWIW, I prefer an all-male military. But it's not the reality, and I respect the women who choose to serve.


51 posted on 03/17/2006 12:56:15 PM PST by StarCMC (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing...thank you Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC

I usually stay out of these threads, since it's really just an unfortunate situation however it works out. There are valid points on either side.


52 posted on 03/17/2006 1:26:08 PM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
There's a pretty high hurdle a non-custodial parent has to clear before custody is changed.

I do believe that any court action would be deferred until the serving parent is home.

53 posted on 03/17/2006 1:28:57 PM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

Tell it to the judge, honey...best interests of the child, and all that.


54 posted on 03/17/2006 1:29:55 PM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
The women are fighting in war, what kind of men are these guys?

Ex-husbands?

55 posted on 03/17/2006 1:31:25 PM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

'pears, though, that he HAD gone away and was just sending a check...... Some men prefer it.


56 posted on 03/17/2006 1:33:45 PM PST by Hi Heels (Don't you wish there were a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Your comment assumes no person was ever involuntarily divorced.


57 posted on 03/17/2006 1:33:55 PM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar

Amen. Let's go get coffee....


58 posted on 03/17/2006 1:34:56 PM PST by Hi Heels (Don't you wish there were a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar

LOL -- me too!!


59 posted on 03/17/2006 1:41:33 PM PST by StarCMC (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing...thank you Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
So, you prefer the alternative, which is being raised by one parent and excluding the other?

My phrasing was bad, sorry- I meant that it is probably better for the child if the parents share custody rather than the child being transferred suddenly from father to mother.

60 posted on 03/17/2006 1:55:17 PM PST by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson