Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia

but Democrats tell us that Al-Qaida and other terrorsists were everywhere in the world EXCEPT Iraq because Sadaam was a secular ruler. How can this be?


4 posted on 03/17/2006 7:47:50 AM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jw777
No, they told us that Al Qaeda was against Saddam because he was a secular ruler, therefore Saddam couldn't have been working with Al Qaeda against the US.
5 posted on 03/17/2006 7:52:34 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: jw777
"but Democrats tell us that Al-Qaida and other terrorsists were everywhere in the world EXCEPT Iraq because Sadaam was a secular ruler. How can this be?"


Ah wait until the "secular" dims start dressing up in their own religious garb. Transformation is in the 'maggot' stage.
16 posted on 03/17/2006 8:04:08 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: jw777
Democrats tell us that Al-Qaida and other terrorsists were everywhere in the world EXCEPT Iraq because Sadaam was a secular ruler. How can this be?

We've heard Dems argue that the TANG files were fake, but accurate, perhaps these are...

True, but inaccurate????

61 posted on 03/17/2006 12:41:28 PM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson