To: Calpernia
but Democrats tell us that Al-Qaida and other terrorsists were everywhere in the world EXCEPT Iraq because Sadaam was a secular ruler. How can this be?
4 posted on
03/17/2006 7:47:50 AM PST by
jw777
To: jw777
No, they told us that Al Qaeda was against Saddam because he was a secular ruler, therefore Saddam couldn't have been working with Al Qaeda against the US.
5 posted on
03/17/2006 7:52:34 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: jw777
"but Democrats tell us that Al-Qaida and other terrorsists were everywhere in the world EXCEPT Iraq because Sadaam was a secular ruler. How can this be?"
Ah wait until the "secular" dims start dressing up in their own religious garb. Transformation is in the 'maggot' stage.
To: jw777
Democrats tell us that Al-Qaida and other terrorsists were everywhere in the world EXCEPT Iraq because Sadaam was a secular ruler. How can this be? We've heard Dems argue that the TANG files were fake, but accurate, perhaps these are...
True, but inaccurate????
61 posted on
03/17/2006 12:41:28 PM PST by
Netheron
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson