Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueminnesota
It's dishonest and underhanded to secretly record private conversations, IMHO, therefore, dirty.

Consider Scenario A: what the senator said is repeated by this guy, but he has not tape to back him up. The senator denies it, the press doesn't run the story. Scenario B: the existence of the tape proves that what is being reported is accurate. The press does run the story.

Which scenario serves the truth? A senator, speaking to a group of people, is not having a private conversation.

By the way, do you feel that Linda Tripp was wrong to record her conversations with Monica?

14 posted on 03/17/2006 8:30:24 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ikka

I hold by my opinion of secretly recording private and personal conversations, regardless if I'm happy about the outcome. If it was another politician doing this I wouldn't say anything. I'm just suprised at it being a pastor. That's all. I won't say any more because I see people will misunderstand and think I love Dean Johnson or gay marriage or something.


15 posted on 03/17/2006 8:36:47 AM PST by blueminnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson