Where I come from .. that is the same as saying that York is wrong
Based on FReepers' assertions, I only studied one paragraph of York's piece. I didn't study the entire piece, or even seek its ultimate conclusion. I believe, having read quite a bit of York's work, parts of it are right, and parts of it are wrong.
I don't know for sure that Byron pointed to In Re: Sealed Case and said "that stands for the proposition that the NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program is Constitutional," but I think a number of FReepers took his piece as such.
I think that connection was in error, and decided to post, probably because I'm anal retentive.