Skip to comments.
Astronomers Detect First Split-Second of the Universe (WMAP & CMB)
LiveScience.com on yahoo ^
| 3/16/06
| Ker Than
Posted on 03/16/2006 6:35:03 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
.. a tiny region, likely no larger than a marble, grew in a trillionth of a second to become larger than the visible universe ..
wow
2
posted on
03/16/2006 6:35:26 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge
Cool - so everything got pushed around a few billion times faster then the speed of light.
Warp Drive here we come !
3
posted on
03/16/2006 6:38:37 PM PST
by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: NormsRevenge
grew in a trillionth of a second to become larger than the visible universe ..
That happens after marriage a lot also...
4
posted on
03/16/2006 6:39:09 PM PST
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: NormsRevenge
.. a tiny region, likely no larger than a marble, grew in a trillionth of a second to become larger than the visible universe ..
As in, "Let there be light?"
To: NormsRevenge
> .. a tiny region, likely no larger than a marble,
> grew in a trillionth of a second to become larger
> than the visible universe ..
Which implies that the speed of light speed limit is a
property of the evolved universe, and not the nothingness
that preceded it. A fairly startling postulation. Gotta
wonder how much energy went out of sight forever at the
time.
Assuming any of this hypothesis is correct, of course,
and considering that base cosomology has changed radically
just during my lifetime, I give this theory about 7 years.
6
posted on
03/16/2006 6:44:47 PM PST
by
Boundless
To: NormsRevenge
The new WMAP observations ... reveal what the universe was like in the first trillionth of a second after the Big Bang. The important question is: What happened in the second BEFORE the Big Bang?
7
posted on
03/16/2006 6:48:09 PM PST
by
Grim
To: NormsRevenge
Scientists were also able to conclude that the universe is composed of about 4 percent real matter, about 23 percent dark matter, and about 73 percent dark energy. Nobody actually nows what dark matter or dark energy are, however.This is what is known in the business as a S.W.A.G.
8
posted on
03/16/2006 6:49:47 PM PST
by
JOAT
To: Grim
Let me try that one "Joe, the leader of the pseudoscience faction, reached out and gently pushed the button.".
9
posted on
03/16/2006 6:51:32 PM PST
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Dialup Llama
As in, "Let there be light?" Based on the extent the universe expanded 'in a trillionth of a second' as per the article, the light would have taken years to catch up.
10
posted on
03/16/2006 6:52:04 PM PST
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: NormsRevenge
Nobody actually nows what dark matter or dark energy are, however.
That's not true.
To: NormsRevenge
There is another thread.
That being said, it is refreshing to see excellent results from WMAP and the promise of even better.
12
posted on
03/16/2006 6:54:25 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: Boundless
Which implies that the speed of light speed limit is a property of the evolved universe, and not the nothingness that preceded it. Actually, no. The speed of light is a limitation on how quickly things can travel *through* space (which is almost every kind of motion we work with for all practical purposes), but it's not a limitation on how fast space itself can *expand*, carrying things with it. The "motion" described in the passage you quoted is of the latter type, not the former.
To: Dialup Llama
[.. a tiny region, likely no larger than a marble, grew in a trillionth of a second to become larger than the visible universe ..] As in, "Let there be light?"
Actually, light as we know it wasn't possible for the first N seconds (I'm too lazy to look it up right now) of the Universe's life, that only became possible after the Universe had expanded far enough that it was no longer opaque.
To: NormsRevenge
Where did the marble come from?
15
posted on
03/16/2006 7:01:25 PM PST
by
Cobra64
To: Grim
"The important question is: What happened in the second BEFORE the big bang?"
Elementary Dr Watson: A match was struck and a very short fuse was ignited.
16
posted on
03/16/2006 7:02:09 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(President Bush isn't perfect, the caliber of his critics create that illusion.)
To: Cobra64
From toys R US of course.
17
posted on
03/16/2006 7:04:11 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(President Bush isn't perfect, the caliber of his critics create that illusion.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
"During this growth spurt, a tiny region, likely no larger than a marble, grew in a trillionth of a second to become larger than the visible universe," said WMAP researcher David Spergel, also from Princeton University. Science believes that the entire universe evolved from the size of a marble to bigger than the universe in a trillionth of a second, yet they have a tough time believing that the Genesis account took 6 days.
To: Boundless
Yes, it is puzzling.
Light travels @ 186+ thousand miles per second.
So, the explosion generated a sphere whose radius was
thousands of times larger than 186,214 miles at the
end of T+one second.
Poor Albert E. What about Mc squared???
19
posted on
03/16/2006 7:06:36 PM PST
by
cliff630
(cliff630 (Didn't Pilate ask Christ, "What is the Truth." Even while looking in the face of TRUTH))
To: Grim
What happened in the second BEFORE the Big Bang? There was no second before the BB.
20
posted on
03/16/2006 7:06:46 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson