Posted on 03/16/2006 6:30:47 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's failure to put a multibillion dollar public works bond on the June ballot robs him of a fresh accomplishment just as he is poised to begin asking voters for a new term.
The bond's failure, at least for now, is more than just an ordinary legislative setback. Schwarzenegger has staked his re-election on an ambitious plan to use the bonds to rebuild the state's aging roads, schools and water projects.
The governor still has time to rescue his plan and put some sort of bond on the November ballot. But the difficulty he is having underscores the impression voters already have that Schwarzenegger is ineffective.
He runs the risk that his $222 billion statewide rebuilding plan will become yet another big idea - like "blowing up the boxes" of the state bureaucracy during his first full year in office and last year's special election - that Schwarzenegger announced with great fanfare only to watch it fall apart.
"I think it gets to the point where the question is whether he has any effectiveness as a governor," said Bill Carrick, a Democratic strategist who is not working for either of the governor's two potential opponents. "This guy is the governor of California and what's he doing?"
Schwarzenegger tried to put the best face on things Thursday with a morning-after news conference in which he thanked legislators for their hard work, although the Senate failed to pass even one of his many bond proposals.
"I don't see the glass half empty; I see the glass half full," Schwarzenegger said, insisting that the negotiations have had a beneficial effect by educating Californians about the need to rebuild. "We are dealing here with a lot of issues that have not been addressed for decades."
The governor also said it did not matter whether the bonds appeared on the June or November ballot.
Schwarzenegger's supporters point out that while the Legislature did not pass a bond, both houses did give overwhelming support to repairing the levees of the Central Valley, which Schwarzenegger has made a priority.
Last month, he issued an emergency declaration to speed repairs. Without them, the levees are in danger of catastrophic flooding.
To a certain extent, the Legislature's failure to pass any sort of bond for June is the result of disharmony among Democratic leaders, who have competing priorities.
While Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, D-Los Angeles, a key ally of the California Teachers Association, promotes bonds for new school construction, Senate President Don Perata, D-Oakland, an ally of the building trades, believes the priority should be transportation.
Sentiment among Republican lawmakers for Schwarzenegger's borrowing plan has ranged from lukewarm to hostile. They have criticized the size, which started at $68 billion but fell to about $50 billion, and demanded environmental and other reforms. The Republican resistance, despite polling that shows the governor's ideas are popular among Republican voters, makes it easy for his opponents to portray him as weak.
"He has done nothing to move the Republicans off where they were in the first place, except in the limited way the Assembly was able to take advantage of last night," said Gale Kaufman, who advises Nunez, referring to bipartisan support for separate levee and school bonds.
Schwarzenegger may yet put some sort of public works bond on the November ballot. But to do that, he must navigate the Democrat-controlled Legislature, just when Democrats will be most focused on trying to oust him from office.
If the governor can overcome the political obstacles, one analyst said he could benefit by having his proposals put to a vote in November. General elections attract young and ethnic voters who are sympathetic to government spending. And polls show most voters support the governor's ideas.
Schwarzenegger could run television commercials supporting the bond, a bipartisan accomplishment, while he promotes himself as a candidate.
Mark DiCamillo, director of the nonpartisan Field Poll, said such a scenario "complicates his Democratic challengers' lives more than it complicates his life."
DiCamillo also said Schwarzenegger's current problems may not be registering with voters, who aren't yet paying attention to the governor's race, much less the details of what happens in Sacramento.
But if a bond package fails to make it onto the November ballot, Schwarzenegger is bound to suffer. His accomplishments to date - rescinding the car tax, reducing the state deficit and presiding over an improving economy - will be distant and diffuse.
To win re-election, he most likely will have to change the subject from his performance in office to the qualifications of his Democratic opponents - Treasurer Phil Angelides and Controller Steve Westly - something his allies already are beginning to do.
"His re-election won't be about bonds," said Jim Brulte, the former Republican Senate leader. "His re-election will be Angelides' or Westly's vision of the future versus his vision of the future."
With Schwarzenegger as Governor, they get cover for things like stem cell research, massive bonded indebtedness, no reforms in the regulations costing taxpayers, families and businesses billions each year in non productive mandated costs.
This is exactly what I said would happen before the recall.
Maybe FareOpinion can tell us what's wrong with this analysis, seeing as the reality of Arnold's performance has confirmed the thesis.
With Arnold they also get to fund their enviro wet dreams of dam removal, conservancies, and levee setbacks (aka riparian corridors ala UNESCO Man in the Biosphere crapola). Just got back from working in Eureka and saw the Arnold commercials being run on local cable TV by the US Chamber of Commerce...what a pack of lies...it spoke as if the bonds were a done deal, no mention of the tax hike contained in the legislation.
What the hell is going on here that the US Chamber of Commerce is supporting Arnold's dismal performance as guv?
That sounds so familiar.
The key is located in the New Majority and gang's recent hires, Mattthew Dowd and Steve Schmidt.
The California Chamber of Commerce has been one of the governor’s closest allies. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is one of the closest allies of President George W. Bush’s administration. “Independent expenditure” campaigns were a staple of the Bush 2004 re-election campaign. Governor Schwarzenegger’s new chief political strategist, Mattthew Dowd, was Bush’s chief strategist in 2004. Governor Schwarzenegger’s new campaign manager, Steve Schmidt, was head of the rapid response team in the Bush 2004 campaign.
Rove buzzed Parsky when the recall ramped up and Parsky introduced Wilson to the Bush's west coast money men; the New Majority.
Like the NRDC Board of Directors?
It is getting to the point that there is virtually no difference between Arnold and the Democrats...it is essentially the same agenda. If the CAGOP goes full bore socialist, who will be the opposition? Taxpayer groups? Talk radio hosts?
Both seek to increase the cost of government. Arnold wants to do it on credit, whereby the bond-holders get to call the shots.
Think of it as being more effective than making a campaign donation while still making a profit.
"The good news is that Democrats need Arnold."
====
Then please explain why are they doing everything in their power to defeat him?
This afternoon, one of KMJ radio's talk personalities, prepped his afternoon audience with excerpts from Stephen Frank's article posted earlier this afternoon on this topic.
I want some of what you are smokin!
Emotionally, Democrats should be in the cat bird’s seat this coming fall.
Whether Angelides or Westly faces Schwarzenegger, whether a whole or bloodied Democrat faces a Republican rival, the result will be the same. A progressive/liberal will be elected governor of California. The new governor may not be a registered Democrat, but he will still be a progressive/liberal.
Let the feathers fly over the next three months for the outcome is certain and a few feathers won’t obscure the goal line.
OR, simply because they're Democrats, and like their blindly partisan, Republican contemporaries, when they see a red cape with an R on it, they lose all reason and charge the Austrian matador.
Arnold, you have round-heel disease. You are unclean.
And, California Voters, most of you have round heels, too.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.