As you ahould be able to see from my post, I was talking about since the election. Also, those votes were at least as much anti-Kerry as they were genuinely pro-Bush, as I'm sure you well know.
No, what has happened is conservatives have started to swallow the lies and polls feed to them by the rat media.
Nice try. It wasn't the "rat media" that "lied" about Bush's atrocious record on border security. If anything, they've provided cover for him there.
Your predictions of conservatives abondoning the GOP are less convincing since you have been Bush-bashing for 4 years
And your unshakable pro-Bush stance - what does that do for your credibility in claiming that the Republicans are safe from a third-party threat? The only way my predictions could serve any "agenda" is by making the GOP's policies be more in line with the vast majority of conservatives and of Americans. What agenda would your "predictions" serve?
Thanks for that old quote from me, by the way. As you can clearly see from following the link, I was putting my opposition to Bush's policies in perspective, by highlighting my far greater opposition to the Left, and by chastising a poster who failed to see the difference between the two.
That "atrocious record" includes putting more agents on the border and toughening identification standards. His record is better than any President since Ike, and unlike Reagan he has yet to amnesty one illegal.
I was putting my opposition to Bush's policies in perspective, by highlighting my far greater opposition to the Left
The words adamantly opposed to just about everything Bush, Ashcroft, & Co. have been doing to the Constitution show your atagonism to the GOP. If you hate rats just as much, this just solidify my implication that you have been a 3rd party supporter all along.