Senators near compromise on immigration reform (HERE IT COMES)

REUTERS ^ | 16 March 2006 | Donna Smith

[VU4G10]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Under pressure to produce broad immigration reform legislation by the end of the month, a U.S. Senate panel on Thursday neared agreement on a proposal that would give some of the 12 million illegal aliens living in the country an opportunity to earn citizenship.

Although no vote will be held until after a weeklong congressional recess, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday appeared ready to back a proposal by panel member Sen. Edward Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, who has worked on the issue with his Republican colleague John McCain of Arizona.

The panel, which is working on comprehensive immigration and border security legislation, will also consider a related proposal that would allow foreigners to enter the United States as legal guest workers and then have a chance to earn permanent status.

Republicans are divided over immigration policy, and the Judiciary Committee plan is likely to spark a firestorm from conservatives who oppose regularizing the status of illegal immigrants, saying they would be rewarded after breaking U.S. immigration law.

But backers cite both economic and security reasons. They say that providing a path to permanent residency and eventual citizenship will avoid creating a permanent underclass of workers and help bring illegals aliens out of the shadows.

Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican who opposes giving permanent status to illegals, said after the meeting that the panel would probably vote for the Kennedy plan.

"The votes are there," Grassley said.

NO AMNESTY

Kennedy told the committee the proposal was not an amnesty. People seeking legal status would have to pay a $2,000 fine, apply for a six-year temporary status, have a job, pay taxes, learn English and show an understanding of U.S. government.

They would not get permanent status faster than the three million foreigners awaiting legal entry, he said.

"There is no moving to the front of the line, there is no free ticket," Kennedy said. "This is not amnesty."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, quipped that the requirements "probably exclude half of my family."

The panel also reached tentative agreement on a guest worker program sought by President George W. Bush has said he wants. A compromise struck between Kennedy and Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, would give future temporary workers an opportunity to seek permanent status after four years.

U.S. business groups favor creating a temporary worker program to help fill jobs that Americans either cannot or will not do. Both business and labor groups also favor giving current undocumented workers a way to legalize their status.

Committee members said details would be worked out during the recess.

The panel is working against a deadline set by Majority Leader Bill Frist. The Tennessee Republican, and possible contender in the 2008 presidential race, wants the Senate to take up a bill addressing only enforcement and border security. He threatened to do that on March 27 if the Judiciary Committee failed to reach agreement on comprehensive legislation.

Whether Congress will finalize immigration legislation before the November congressional elections is unclear. Both Democrats and Republicans are likely to use the issue to gain advantage.

The House of Representatives has voted for tough border security and enforcement legislation with no guest worker program. The two sides would have to work out their differences before a bill could be sent to Bush for his signature.

[inquest]

I haven't seen any valid argument from you to show Bush and Kerry are not the 2 most popular politicians in the country

And there's nothing to show that they are the two most popular. If you can't understand the concept of someone voting for a candidate, not because they like him, but because they hate the other guy worse, then there's not much that can be done for you.

[inquest]

I assumed since you want to seal the border, expelling the illegals currently here was the next step.

Secure the borders first, then we can assess what needs to be done from there.

[mthom]

So you do support a massive preference for mexicans in our immigration policies.

[Once-Ler]

And there's nothing to show that they are the two most popular.

Of course there is. I already posted my evidence. See if you can recall the previous posts.

[freepatriot32]

Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here

[Once-Ler]

So you do support a massive preference for mexicans in our immigration policies.

What does it matter mthom? Your short contradictory replies have not impressed me as worth a more thoughtful response, and I have no desire to explain myself to you as I doubt it would be appreciated. I've already responded to you with a reply that I think is more than adequate given the thoughtfulness of your post. I really don't care what you think, and I doubt your question stems from a desire to understand my opinion, but rather to argue, in your shallow and simple way, why you think my opinion is not valid. Again I just don't care what you think.

Have a nice day.

[inquest]

You were shown how that "evidence" doesn't amount to a hill of beans. And you don't have to go back very far to recall it.

[mthom]

Whether you wanted to or not you just answered the question. That would be a big Yes.