Your position is based on business evidence. Mine is based on spiritual evidence.
Your position is based on only your feelings. You don't want to take a chance that the evidence that they are allies might be wrong.
My position is not based on feelings. My position is based on fact of which there is plenty of.
And you seem to agree that conservatives are not suppose to act that way . . . so I s'pose if you're okay with your position and it's lack of rational evidence, then there's nothing more to be said.
If your trivializing the Qu'ran and what it means to muslims and non-muslims, you are gravely mistaken. You look at this from a business stand point in that they have been good allies for several years (Which I agree with). I look at it from a spiritual standpoint in that what they do will effect them forever (according to the Qu'ran). IMO, their spiritual health is much more important than their business/monetary gains especially when dealing with the US (it better be,or else Allah wants them dead as well). JMO, of course.
Ok, that's a good enough statement of our differences for me.
I would require evidence to show that this group of people, the leaders of UAE and the managers of DPW, are a danger to US interests. Instead of blanket condemning all muslims.
YMMV.