Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

No responsible adult would have kids at the age of 70.


21 posted on 03/16/2006 6:51:42 PM PST by The Worthless Miracle ("Better put some ice on that")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: The Worthless Miracle
"No responsible adult would have kids at the age of 70."

I'm sure the kid is happy to be here though. Some parents would have had the kid scooped out by a medical instrument and discarded.

22 posted on 03/16/2006 7:21:57 PM PST by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: The Worthless Miracle

That's a ridiculous claim. Since we're talking about men here, many men do better as fathers at an older age then younger. Thurmond was as healthy and energetic at 70 as most men in their 40s, and it wasn't considered "scandalous" at all in the 1970s.

You could have children in your teens and 20s and not necessarily live to see them to adulthood. My grandmother was 30 when she had my mother and aunt and died of cancer when her children were teens. Thurmond lived long enough to see his kids to adulthood, and sadly, outlived one of his daughters who was killed by a drunk driver. I think his actions were neither irresponsible or disgusting, and neither did most South Carolinians.


23 posted on 03/16/2006 7:26:01 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: The Worthless Miracle

Better to have them when you're 70 than 12.


25 posted on 03/17/2006 5:59:48 AM PST by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson