There is evidence that there would be no danger, yes.
DPW has operated ports around the world and never once been accused of risking port security.
UAE is a trusted ally (albeit not perfect). That is evidence that they are on our side, and that it is not in their interests to allow our ports to be endangered.
And besides -- it was *liberals* who claimed that evidence doesn't matter, it was the seriousness of the accusation.
Conservatives are *suppose* to make decisions based on evidence. Not just support policies proposed by Schumer and Hilly.
Ya'll have been had by the MSM.
Not nearly enough IMHO. No Arab government should have that kind of accesssin a US port in this day and time.
And, the CFIUS is supposed to follow its own rules.
As well, the administration is supposed to give us a better case than "Trust me."
This decision was made, by-and-large, based on direct and incontravertable evidence of the UAE's complicity with, and involvement in the 9/11 attack.