Only because you keep moving the goal posts.
Or should we say changing the size of the evidence...or the metaphorical football in this case.
There is evidence post-9/11...which in many ways is as significant as the evidence extant pre-9/11.
Only because you keep moving the goal posts.
Or should we say changing the size of the evidence...or the metaphorical football in this case.
There is evidence post-9/11...which in many ways is as significant as the evidence extant pre-9/11.
In my first post in this thread, Post 93 stated exactly the same request I just restated.
I repeat, yet again: Do you have evidence that DPW has ever, or will ever, endanger the security of any port?
I've been consistent. And so far, not one fact has been posted by anyone that would show that DPW (or the UAE) have ever endangered the security at a port. Your side seems consistent in believing that such evidence is not needed. I simply disagree.
So until someone on your side answers my simple, direct question -- there is nothing else to be said. Our discussion has come to a fruitless end. :-)
He's been shown the UAE consistently votes against the USA in the UN.
He's been shown over and over that the UAE got all hot and bothered by the Muslim cartoons.
He's been shown over and over the links between AlQaida and the UAE.
He's been shown that the UAE represses human rights and engages in humn trafficking and trafficking arms.
And on and on. Facts don't matter.