I am operating under the assumption that times change, the individuals involved change, and the policies change based on geo-politics.
For example, 9/11 changed their policies, and seems to have turned them into staunch allies of the US.
I also don't believe that the govt controls all crime in the country. If smuggling, money-laundering, etc, is going on, then most likely it's without the govt's blessing.
Were they an enemy prior to 9/11? Did they shun us? NO. They were, and are, an ally of convenience.
I don't get you guys. Why is it so damn important that we turn over control of some of our terminals to a foreign govt? I just don't see the need or the urgency?
Human nature never changes...
The bit-players and tactics sometimes modernize or shift, but the basic story-line is always there.
The WoT is fundamentally no different from the Muhammadean atrocities, and subsequent Christian Crusades that have been taking place to some extent ever since Mad Mo put pen to paper.
Their goals; domination/subjugation/extermination of 'infidels', and control of the Holy Land haven't changed a bit. The weaponry is a bit more high-tech, they've gained some advantage due to the oil trade, and picked-up a few subtleties from General Mao's teachings. That's the only real difference.
Better to fight on their turf than here. Bush got that much right in his doctrine, but then proceeded to contradict himself by supporting this deal. Methinks his family's personal friendships with the Saudi and UAE royals have become a weakness in his ability to recognize a threat.
If the UAE is a staunch ally, I wonder how our enemies vote in the UN.
According to Rep. Louie Rep. Gohmert, Texas on Hannity stated, the UN had 79 votes last year. 62 times the UAE voted against the US. 62 TIMES. 5 times they voted in favor of the US. 10 times they abstained and were absent the others.