Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC

But which analyses?

The bit about expansion, or the bit about mutations in cancer cells, or both?


307 posted on 03/16/2006 6:05:56 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]


To: Vicomte13
The bit about expansion, or the bit about mutations in cancer cells, or both?

It is not called expansion. It is called inflation. That is not observed, it is implied. Mutations are observed. The model is implied from the data observed and that model does not apparently fit very well into a random mutation, natural selection paradigm. The mutations do not appear to be random and the fitnesses are equivalent. What is there to select?

321 posted on 03/16/2006 6:58:01 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson