Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
Moving more than 1 light year in less time than 1 year would put a damper on every scientist who claims day in and day out that you can't accelerate mass faster than the Speed of Light.

That's not what the theory says, though the article is admittedly misleading on this point. What it means is that the observable horizon, from a given point, expanded to this size in a fraction of a second; space became "transparent," and this transparency is what "traveled". No matter, energy, or information actually traveled faster than light, according to the model.

An analogous situation - take a flashlight beam and wave it across the sky - you've made a beam "travel" from one star to another in a few seconds, but nothing actually travels from one star to the other in that time, even though, eventually, the beam reaches both stars simultaneously. (i.e. relativity still holds)

154 posted on 03/16/2006 1:07:15 PM PST by Quark2005 (Confidence follows from consilience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Quark2005
An analogous situation - take a flashlight beam and wave it across the sky - you've made a beam "travel" from one star to another in a few seconds,

By the way, a new crop circle appeared in the field behind your house. I translated the symbols for you; they said: "Enough with the high-beams, already!"
174 posted on 03/16/2006 1:23:50 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson