While I agree it is dispicable of Clinton to do that, I will put two points forward then shut my trap on it.
1. Does anyone think the "religious right" isn't going to to be against Hillary anyway?
2. How long ago was this attack against the religious right by Clinton?
1. The question isn't whether they are against hillary--the question is whether they will vote against hillary. If, for example, the GOP candidate isn't socially conservative enough, the RR could very well place a de facto vote for hillary by either sitting home or, if available, voting for a 'Perot.'
2. clinton made this 'sermon' at the Riverside Church in Harlem right before the Republican convention in '04. When I heard it in real time, I decided on the spot to do a piece on it. Got sidetrack and forgot about it... that is, until I was asked last week why I used the phrase "through a glass darkly.' (You aren't suggesting that clinton has had a change of heart, are you?) ;)
Clinton's never have a change of heart only a change positions when a political gain can be made.
(You aren't suggesting that clinton has had a change of heart, are you?) ;)
My point remains the same: The Religious Right has its survival (and very possibly America's) in its control.
The choice is stark: Stay home and place a de facto vote for the clinton-Soros-democrat machine, i.e., the people who want to crush you (and the party who will cripple Bush and lose the war)...
or support Bush and the war effort, and vote for an admittedly imperfect GOP.
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
