Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Seeks Curbs On '527' Groups
The Washington Post ^ | March 16, 2006 | Jeffrey H. Birnbaum and Jonathan Weisman

Posted on 03/16/2006 7:23:51 AM PST by yoe

House Republican leaders proposed changes in lobbying laws yesterday that would include a crackdown on independent, big-money committees that heavily aided Democrats in the 2004 elections.

[snip] Rep. John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), recently elected House majority leader, has argued that it is far more important to increase disclosure requirements for lobbyists and lawmakers than to limit their interaction. But in a surprising development yesterday, House GOP leaders decided to try to intervene in a fast-growing sector of campaign finance that has mostly benefited Democratic candidates.

[snip] Instead, the groups would be governed by federal campaign finance laws that would restrict such giving to a total of $30,000 from individuals per year. By contrast, during the 2004 election cycle, Soros gave $27 million and Lewis gave nearly $24 million to Democratic-oriented 527 groups, according to PoliticalMoneyLine, a nonpartisan research company.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 527groups; bribery; cfr; corruption; democrats; fundraising; georgesoros; gop; pac; pacs; tammanyhall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/16/2006 7:23:54 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

later read


2 posted on 03/16/2006 7:26:24 AM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
This just shows the stupidity of our "campaign finance" laws.
An individual (not PACs or corporations) should be free to give any amount he wishes to his favorite candidate (with full public disclosure).
It's a free country.
Instead, the law limits how much an individual can give, and PAC and corporate giving proliferates unchecked.
3 posted on 03/16/2006 7:28:15 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
C.F.R., brought to you by "The Maverick" Republican and the "ImpeachThePresident" Democrat.
4 posted on 03/16/2006 7:28:18 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

What part of "no law" don't these people understand????

5 posted on 03/16/2006 7:31:22 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Please read that article and this one: (Saipan's Willie Tan & Hillary)
6 posted on 03/16/2006 7:32:28 AM PST by yoe ("If the enemy is in range, so are you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: XR7

Actually, I believe an individual is free to pay for whatever campaign ads he wants, without any restrictions. But he must act as an individual, not as a committee or an agent for someone else.


7 posted on 03/16/2006 7:33:04 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Actually, I believe an individual is free to pay for whatever campaign ads he wants...

But you can only legally contribute $2000 per year to a candidate directly.

8 posted on 03/16/2006 7:39:23 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

McVain is an idiot bump....


9 posted on 03/16/2006 7:42:36 AM PST by eureka! (Hey Lefties and 'Rats: 3 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

"What part of "no law" don't these people understand????"

The Supreme Court has already ruled the "Money" doesn't equal "Speech".


10 posted on 03/16/2006 7:52:57 AM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Correction:

The Supreme Court has already ruled THAT "money" doesn't equal "speech".


11 posted on 03/16/2006 7:54:31 AM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yoe

This CFR needs to make a revisit to the SCOTUS. I have a bit more confidence it will be trash canned than I did before.


12 posted on 03/16/2006 7:54:53 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Thanks to John Mcpain(The Lone Republican among the Keating 5 to be caught with their hand in the Cookie Jar)the congress passed, the president signed and the SCOTUS upheld a clear rebuke of the constitution. With laws and lawmakers like this I grieve for your democracy.
13 posted on 03/16/2006 8:03:39 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Expect the MSM to come out against this.


14 posted on 03/16/2006 8:30:46 AM PST by Oh Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Republican parasites hate competition from 'Rat parasites.

Our entire government needs an enema, top to bottom.

15 posted on 03/16/2006 8:32:09 AM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
But he must act as an individual, not as a committee or an agent for someone else.

What's proper about that limitation? If I want to peaceably assemble with others of like mind, and we wish to spend our money in concert, who are you to stand in the way?

16 posted on 03/16/2006 8:45:47 AM PST by Tree of Liberty (requiescat in pace, President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty

I'm just stating what the current situation is. No endorsement is implied.


17 posted on 03/16/2006 8:47:18 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

I misunderstood you, then. Thanks for clarifying.


18 posted on 03/16/2006 8:49:38 AM PST by Tree of Liberty (requiescat in pace, President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Banning Gambling. Castrating 527s. Raising the debt limit. What the hell kind of priorities are these? Did y'all vote for this?

I don't care how much MoveOn.org raised last cycle...it didn't work. But OUR 527, the SwiftBoat Vets, in my opinion made the difference. Without that 527, the weak Bush campaign could well have lost that election. The Swifites killed Kerry. Leave the damn 527's alone.

19 posted on 03/16/2006 9:15:17 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oh Brother
Expect the MSM to come out against this.

As should we all.

20 posted on 03/16/2006 9:17:00 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson