Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Settlement Reached in John Ritter Suit
Yahoo News ^ | Mar. 15, 2006

Posted on 03/16/2006 5:07:35 AM PST by COUNTrecount

LOS ANGELES - The family of late actor John Ritter has reached a tentative settlement in a wrongful death lawsuit against Providence St. Joseph Medical Center in Burbank, where the actor died, an attorney for the hospital said Wednesday.

"There is an agreement in principle," attorney Rory Hernandez told The Associated Press. "But we still have to follow the legal procedure."

Hearings will be held to finalize the agreement, he said, with the next court session set for Friday.

Hernandez declined to disclose details of the settlement. The hospital will issue a statement in several weeks, he said.

Court documents filed by the hospital on March 10 indicate Ritter's family members "are potentially receiving a large monetary settlement in this case." Ritter's widow, Amy Yasbeck, has claimed damages in excess of $25 million, court documents show.

Yasbeck and Ritter's four children accused the hospital of negligence when they filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court on Sept. 3, 2004.

Ritter, star of the sitcom "8 Simple Rules for Dating My Teenage Daughter," collapsed on the set of the TV show on Sept. 11, 2003. The 54-year-old actor was admitted to the hospital complaining of chest pain, nausea, vomiting and dizziness. He died later that night.

Ritter's family claims the actor was misdiagnosed "at least twice and underwent improper and unnecessary procedures" during his hospital stay.

Doctors said Ritter died of an aortic aneurysm.

Ritter came to prominence in 1977 as Jack Tripper on the hit sitcom "Three's Company."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ambulancechasers; aorticdissection

1 posted on 03/16/2006 5:07:37 AM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Ritter's widow, Amy Yasbeck, has claimed damages in excess of $25 million, court documents show.



Yeah, that will make up for it all.......


2 posted on 03/16/2006 5:37:24 AM PST by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The doctors should have refused to treat Ritter so as not to risk misdiagnosis.


3 posted on 03/16/2006 5:38:25 AM PST by Niteranger68 ("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It won't make up for it, obviously.But, if someone didn't do their job properly they need to be held accountable.Its an old concept, not as much in favor as it used to be.


4 posted on 03/16/2006 5:41:38 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

No wonder health care is so expensive. Lawyers will even sue for the rich.


5 posted on 03/16/2006 5:44:07 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
The 54-year-old actor was admitted to the hospital complaining of chest pain, nausea, vomiting and dizziness.

The same exact thing happened to Jonathan Larson, the "RENT" composer years ago, and was misdiagnosed by 2 NY hospitals, and even had his stomach pumped when one of them thought it was food poisoning--somehow missing the massive black anneurysm oval on the chest x-ray. The disgraceful "care" given Larson was bad enough. But AFTER Larson, and the enormous publicity that malpractice got, there was no excuse whatsoever for the Ritter oversight. I hope the family not only got tens of millions for his death, but also that the MD's who screwed it up are banned from medicine.

6 posted on 03/16/2006 6:48:16 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150
The doctors should have refused to treat Ritter so as not to risk misdiagnosis.

The doctors who treated Ritter were incompetant and should lose their licenses.

7 posted on 03/16/2006 6:49:34 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813
My brother-in-law had an aortic aneurysm last year. The little hospital near their very small town out on the desert knew something was wrong, but could not diagnose it. They airlifted him to a larger hospital where they figured out what the problem was. He had surgery the next day and he is still alive and kicking.

I had alway thought an aneurysm was a "drop dead" kind of thing. I did not realize people could survive them if they were correctly diagnosed in time.

8 posted on 03/16/2006 7:06:46 AM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson