Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
You claim:

Actually, a bill of attainder can be done. It requires the constitutional process of changing the constitution to accomodate bills of attainder.
It is not beyond the reach.

Not true. -- We cannot 'amend away' our basic inalienable rights without voiding the constitutional contract.
-- 'Laws' passed that are repugnant to constitutional principles are null & void.

I'm not talking about a law being passed. I'm talking about the constitution itself being amended.

So am I: -- We cannot 'amend away' our basic inalienable rights..

Do you really contend that we could repeal the 2nd Amendment, - for instance?

120 posted on 03/18/2006 11:25:07 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

I think there is a difference between the words 'could' and 'would.'

I don't think we would, but if 'could' means "is it possible with the current rules," then it is possible with the current rules.

We could amend the constitution to add "A chocolate sundae once a week for every citizen" if we simply ask "do the rules allow it."


121 posted on 03/18/2006 11:33:08 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Pray for Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson