Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Japan and the West, it's breed or die [Mark Steyn]
Jerusalem Post ^ | Mar. 16, 2006 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 03/15/2006 5:09:01 PM PST by Alouette

Here is Theodore Faron, Fellow of Merton College, Oxford, writing in the year 2021: "Like a lecherous stud suddenly stricken with impotence, we are humiliated at the very heart of our faith in ourselves. For all our knowledge, our intelligence, our power, we can no longer do what the animals do without thought."

That's from the first chapter of P. D. James' novel The Children Of Men. On the shelves at Borders, Baroness James is the Agatha Christie de nos jours, but she has other strings to her bow and her dystopian vision of a world in which the human race is unable to breed is a marvelous read, if not quite true to life: In The Children Of Men, man is physically impotent; out here in the real world, it would be accurate to say we're psychosomatically barren - at least in the non-red-state parts of the developed world.

I've been a big demography bore for a while now and it affords some melancholy satisfaction to see the other fellows catching up, at least apropos Europe. The literal facts of life are what underpins, for example, the Danish cartoon war - the belated realization among Continentals that they're elderly and fading and that their Muslim populations are young and surging, and in all these clashes the latter are putting down markers for the way things will be the day after tomorrow, like the new owners who have the kitchen remodeled before moving in.

Pre-9/11, I never paid much attention to demography. A decade ago, I accepted the experts' standard line that the Japanese economy had tanked because the joint was riddled with protectionism and cronyism. But so what? You could have said the same 30 years ago, when the place was booming, or 15 years ago, when we were bombarded with all those TV commercials warning that the yellow peril was annexing America. The only real structural difference between Japan then and Japan now is that the yellow peril got a lot wrinklier: 14% of its population is under 15, as opposed to 21% in the United States, just under 30% in Iran and 40% in Pakistan. What happened in the 1990s was what Yamada Masahiro of Gakugei University calls the first "low birth-rate recession."

THE MOST geriatric jurisdiction on the planet, Nippon's rising sun has now passed into the next phase of its long sunset: net population loss. 2005 was the first year since records began with more deaths than births. The world's other elderly societies have complicating factors: In Europe, the successor population is already in place - Islam - and the only question is how bloody the transfer of real estate will be. But Japan offers the chance to observe the demographic death spiral in its purest form. It's a country with no immigration, no significant minorities and no desire for any: just the Japanese, aging and dwindling.

So what will happen? There are two possible scenarios: Whatever their feelings on immigration, a country with great infrastructure won't stay empty for long, any more than a state-of-the-art factory that goes belly up stays empty for long. At some point, someone else will move in to Japan's plant.

And the alternative? Well, a year ago, the country's toymakers, with fewer and fewer children to serve, began marketing a new doll called Yumel - a baby boy with a range of 1,200 phrases designed to serve as companions for elderly Japanese. He says not just the usual things - "I wuv you" - but also ask the questions your grandchildren would ask if you had any: "Why do elephants have long noses?" Yumel joins his friend, the Snuggling Ifbot, a toy designed to have the conversation of a five-year old child which its makers, with the usual Japanese efficiency, have determined is just enough chit-chat to prevent the old folks going senile.

P. D. James foresaw a similar development: toys for women whose maternal instinct has gone unfulfilled. In The Children Of Men, pretend mothers take their dolls for walks on the street or to the swings in the park.

It's not hard to see where this is going. Will an ever smaller number of young people want to spend their active years looking after an ever greater number of old people? Or will it be simpler to put all that cutting-edge Japanese technology to good use and create a new subordinate worker class? As a popular beat combo predicted back in the Eighties: "Domo arigato, Mr Roboto... For doing the jobs that nobody wants to" Remember who sang that? A band called Styx. And the need to avoid the old one-way ticket up the River Styx is what will prompt Japan to take a flier on Mr. Roboto and, eventually, the post-human future.

There is a third option. Unlike the Europeans, many of whom will flee their continent as Eutopia evolves into Eurabia, the Japanese are not facing ethnic strife and civil war. They could simply start breeding again. But will they? What's easier for the governing class? Weaning a pampered population off the good life and re-teaching them the lost biological impulse or giving the Sony Corporation a license to become the Cloney Corporation? Reporting the latest grim demographics, The Japan Times observed, almost en passant, "Japan joins Germany and Italy in the ranks of countries where a decline in population has already set in."

Japan, Germany and Italy, eh? If the Versailles Treaty was too hard on our enemies, the World War Two settlement was kinder but lethal.

The writer is senior North American columnist for Britain's Telegraph Group.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Japan; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: birthrate; demography; germany; italy; japan; steyn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Alouette

Steyn!


21 posted on 03/15/2006 6:11:22 PM PST by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

But it's Bush's fault!


22 posted on 03/15/2006 6:13:53 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK
On the conservative side, it is commonly believed that 1) birthrates are encyclical that people see fewer children means more resources for children, so they automatically have more children - a self-correcting mechanism; 2) even if the birthrate declines irreversibly, the increased productivity brought forth by modern economy will more than compensate the economic deficits given that yes, there are fewer people on the net, but we can have more of them proportionately working on higher end occupations. Menial labour demands can be reduced by increased industrial and agricultural automations, and even the unsustainable welfare demands can altogether be solved as a falling population forces the society to move into a more market-oriented direction; and 3) overcrowding will become a thing of the past and resources become mroe sustainable.

This is simply a verbose way of stating that conservatives believe that the free market works. How many words does it take you to say "Bears crap in the woods" and "The Pope is Catholic"?

23 posted on 03/15/2006 6:18:13 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
It was obvious to me at the time, although Kahn didn't see it

Hmmmm... who is more likely to come up with a valid analysis of complicated data... Herman Kahn... JoeFromSidney... Herman Kahn... JoeFromSidney... I guess I'll just have to flip a coin....

24 posted on 03/15/2006 6:22:20 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stand4somethin

"I know many of my fellow FReepers hate...Pat Buchanon..."

Yea - I hate him as much as the MSM.

But he's totally nailed it on Europe - that place is doomed in one generation unless they take some fast, and probably very bloody, action now.

On other stuff, we differ a bit. I like Hispanics in this country, given Europe's alternative - but we do really need to end this bi-cultural set-up (i.e., an alternative Spanish-language culture, complete with "Bi-Lingual" education and multi-lingual government documents). If we can only stop the Dems (and their RINO enablers, of course), we could make English official, and those guys would melt in virtually overnight. (of course we still must seal the border)


25 posted on 03/15/2006 6:22:23 PM PST by MediaAnalyst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Maybe that's why we are importing people from countries south of us. Upwardly mobile single women are avoided by men with good chances and different jobs and will be childless. The immigration must stop when people can't even spell in their own language, though. That leads to what we have now.

I'll go with a fence with an entrance area where approved people are given a shower and stand in a line to get 11 shots in the arms and ass before leaving.

26 posted on 03/15/2006 6:29:47 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
People of all kinds work long hours at crappy jobs they hate. Oh of course I'm not talking about you, fellow Freepers /sarc>, but this is a reality for many people. The last thing many of my childless contemporaries want to deal with after a day at work is the demands that children bring. Work is no longer 9-to-5; it's at whatever time and for whatever duration that the boss thinks is most profitable, and your personal life be damned.

And while having a job is no picnic, NOT having a job (and therefore not being able to provide for a family) is even worse.

People don't have the time or the job security to have and raise children. It's that simple.

27 posted on 03/15/2006 6:32:32 PM PST by Alien Gunfighter (Isolationism now! This ain't the 40s!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

I don't buy this argument. The Japanese population may shrink, but they won't disappear. Frankly, their Island is pretty crowded and fewer people might not be a bad thing. If they are smart, though, they won't buy into this immigration "solution", that brings with it more problems than it solves. And if nothing else, the Japanese are smart.


28 posted on 03/15/2006 6:34:47 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
It seems the less religion you have, the less children you have. The more prosperious your country is, generally the less religious it is, so, then you have less children. You must keep religion even when it is no longer "convenient" for you.

Well access to effective birth control fits in there too somewhere. Is there a country that has widespread availability of contraceptives where there is STILL a high birth rate? Certainly these things are not available in the Moslem world.

29 posted on 03/15/2006 6:35:08 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
The once most populous countries in the world becoming barren wastelands. There's irony. We won World II and the Germans and Japanese lost the future in the womb. Go figure.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

30 posted on 03/15/2006 6:35:43 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alien Gunfighter

I think you have something there. Work has become so all consuming and with electronic gadgets there is no escape from it. Prior to the 80s, most people left their job at the office--no longer. Its either succeed or raise children. Children are viewed as a barrier to "success", so its no surprise that there are fewer of 'em.


31 posted on 03/15/2006 6:37:34 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

Look if your really a successful DINK couple you can make $5 Million and live off your cash. That's not going to require more and more people. The USA is NOT suffering demographic decline, due to immigrants.


32 posted on 03/15/2006 6:38:13 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: steve-b; NZerFromHK

Actually I got a lot more out of NZer's post than "the pope is Catholic" or the "free markets work"


33 posted on 03/15/2006 6:41:54 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

I don't know, I've had eight and I kinda wish I'd have had more....


34 posted on 03/15/2006 6:43:39 PM PST by Vor Lady (Mal, "Remember, we just want to scare him." Jayne, "Pain is scary!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

We haven't won.
The fertility rate of white America is 1.83.
America is just like Europe.
The difference is that America's future is relatively bright as the powerhouse of a Spanish-speaking, Catholic Western hemisphere (it will be demographics that complete the work of the Spanish Armada, in a different hemisphere).

In Europe, it is a race to see if sex can secularize North Africans before an Islamic majority forms.


35 posted on 03/15/2006 6:52:25 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

bump.


36 posted on 03/15/2006 6:53:35 PM PST by RebekahT ("Our government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaAnalyst
Most Hispanics going here are upwardly-mobile. Shitty jobs lead to less shitty jobs and so forth. They are also Christian in belief. Mass-migration is also a sign of social decline in the host country. We can absorb some but not all. A stop will come. At that time we can empty our prisons of illegal aliens to their host country and invade Mexico and take it over.

English-speaking white dudes and Spanish or Portuguese-speaking women can get along very nicely. If I can do it in Europe where the strict version of languages are observed, a baggy pants guy can find a woman that speaks the various dialects in SA while listening to rap in the other ear:)

37 posted on 03/15/2006 6:58:26 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stand4somethin
Correct me if I'm wrong, but i believe Pat Buchanon doesn't have any children.
38 posted on 03/15/2006 7:05:06 PM PST by bella1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alien Gunfighter

This is interesting to me, because I have lived in Japan several times, and have hosted Japanese visitors in this country occasionally. Abortion is readily available in Japan and is not a religious or cultural issue there in the way it is here. Never mind the right or wrong of it, I think it is a factor in their population decline. In addition, the younger Japanese women are much slower to marry than in most places, and I think part of the reason is that the Japanese culture poorly accomodates the idea of a working wife other than in the lower classes.

As to infrastructure, immigration, etc., that nation is well-developed and efficient, but the Japanese culture has virtues which allow them to remain economically competetive despite their lack of resources, and I doubt that immigrants who were not well-educated and highly entreprenuerial would select Japan as a destination when there are alternatives where the outsider would find success less difficult or daunting to achieve.

Don't count the Japanese out, however. They have a terrific educational systems, pragmatic and efficient social service programs, and a tight society which loses less to crime and graft than most, and rehabilitates criminals quite effectively, at least in comparison to us.

I think Japan probably has about as many Japanese as its islands can sustain. I think, also, that they recognize it, and would judge overpopulation as considerably more of a threat to Japan than population decline.


39 posted on 03/15/2006 7:09:02 PM PST by mathurine (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Japan----

127,100,000 people {2001}

145,884 square miles

871.2 people per square mile

Yep, Japan is obviously on the verge of turning into an empty desert.

40 posted on 03/15/2006 7:10:50 PM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson