Posted on 03/15/2006 3:42:45 PM PST by Marine Inspector
The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) has dealt the fatal blow to the controversial concept of Guest Worker Amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens now living in the United States in defiance of our laws. The GAO is the investigative arm of Congress charged with examining matters relating to the receipt and payment of public funds.
In a devastating report released today, the GAO charges the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) – this is the agency under the Department of Homeland Security that would be in charge of proposed Guest Worker Amnesty – with a failed organizational infrastructure and massive mismanagement and corruption.
On the eve of debate in the Senate Judiciary Committee, of the House passed Border Protection, Anti-terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 - HR 4437, the GAO report exposes rampant immigration chaos and USCIS corruption. Among the GAO's most alarming findings are that 33 percent of religious worker visas were issued fraudulently. There is documented evidence that radical Islamists, with ties to terrorist organizations, have used the religious worker visa category to gain admission to the United States .
The timing of the report mars the hopes of millions of unethical employers, that on or off their payroll employ 12 million illegal aliens. These crooks were counting on lobbying efforts by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other pro-illegal immigration advocates, for influencing passage of a Guest Worker Amnesty Bill in the Senate.
The Government agency that would be responsible for administering the controversial Guest Worker Amnesty that would reward 12 million illegal aliens living and working un-lawfully with legal status, is the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
The Copley News Service reported on March 7 th , that prior to the damning GAO report, “Michael Maxwell stepped down last month as director of the Office of Security at USCIS, and sought protection under the federal whistle-blower protection law. He claims that senior agency officials had been retaliating against him for telling Congress about what he described as serious national security vulnerabilities that persisted despite his warnings to those running the agency.”
In addition, Maxwell claims the agency lacks the resources to handle some 500 allegations of criminal misconduct against agency employees, including allegations of espionage and acceptance of bribes.
Citizenship and Immigration Services spokeswoman Angelica Alfonso declined requests for an interview. She released a statement yesterday that said the agency is confident of its processes, and that it takes the allegations seriously. This has to be taken with a huge grain of salt as the agency has been under investigation since 2001.
One of Maxwell's attorneys, Rosemary Jenks, said his concerns demonstrate an underlying tension between Citizenship and Immigration Services' dual missions of providing immigration benefits to applicants and of protecting national secur ity.”
Why did the GAO conduct a study on the USCIS?
See Full Report here: (http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/gaoimmbenefits31006.pdfIn 2002)
The just released GAO report documents that immigration benefit fraud was pervasive and significant and the approach to controlling it was fragmented. Experts believe that individuals ineligible for these benefits, including terrorists and criminals, could use fraudulent means to enter or remain in the U.S. The Congress requested that GAO evaluate U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service's (USCIS) anti-fraud efforts.
The report addresses the questions: (1) What do available data and information indicate regarding the nature and extent of fraud? (2) What actions has USCIS taken to improve its ability to detect fraud? (3) What actions does the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) take to sanction those who commit fraud?
Hordes of immigration law attorneys have joined the ranks of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other organizations dedicated to cheapening the wages of American workers through the oversupply of desperate illegal foreign workers. How? Through massive illegal immigration! Our unprotected borders have been allowed to fester with a booming $140 billion per year in drug trafficking and $10 billion dollar in human trafficking in the name of America 's addiction to cheap illegal labor.
Which immigration law firm would not like to have a client base of 12 million desperate illegal aliens that grows at the rate of 2.5 million per year.
In one of the largest labor certification fraud schemes ever uncovered by the GAO, federal investigators found evidence that a single prominent immigration attorney in the Washington, D.C., area submitted at least 1,436 and perhaps as many as 2,700 fraudulent employment applications between 1998 and 2002. According to the sworn testimony of a Department of Labor (DOL) special agent, this attorney and his associates are alleged to have made at least $11.4 million for the 1,400 applications that the agent reviewed, in all of which he found evidence of fraud, and perhaps as much as $21.6 million if all 2,700 applications were fraudulent, as he strongly suspected.
USCIS WEAKNESSES POSE A GREAT THREAT OF TERRORISM
The GAO reports goes on to say, “Some individuals seeking immigration benefits pose a threat to national security and public safety, and white collar and other criminals sometimes facilitate immigration benefit fraud. For example, according to Office of Fraud Detection and National Security ( FDNS ) , each year about 5,200 immigration benefit applicants are identified as potential national security risks, because their personal information matches information contained in U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Interagency Border Inspection System, a database of immigration law violators and people of national security interest. Additionally, according to federal prosecutors, immigration benefit fraud may involve other criminal activity, such as income tax evasion, money laundering, production of fraudulent documents, and conspiracy. Also, organized crime groups have used sophisticated immigration fraud schemes, such as creating shell companies, to bring in aliens ostensibly as employees of these companies. In addition, a number of individuals linked to a hostile foreign power's intelligence service were found to have been employed as temporary alien workers on military research.”
Unethical immigration law attorneys should be charged with aiding and abetting illegal immigrats and in creating an unlawful climate that puts all of us at risk of terrorism. Why? Because o nce one of their clients obtains a temporary work authorization fraudulently, an alien can use it to obtain other valid identity documents such as a temporary social security card and a driver's license, thus facilitating their living and working in the United States . It is important to recognize, in the illegal immigration debate, who butters the immigration attorney's bread.
The GAO found that the USCIS is completely unprepared to handle their 7.5 million case work load with their 3000 employees and this is made all the more unlikely given the management system shortfalls and the brazen level of corruption within the organization. Few if any of the present 500 allegations of criminal misconduct against agency employees will be prosecuted. The GAO finds the agency as it stands will be unable to handle the proposed Guest Worker Amnesty proposals bandied about by President Bush and a bi-partisan group of Senators influenced by tearful pleads accompanied by campaign contributions from employers who currently employ illegal aliens.
USCIS mismanagement and corruption is a menace given that Donna Bucella , the Director of the federal Terrorist Screening Center said Tuesday that the agency maintains a list of 200,000 people known or suspected to be terrorists. She reported yesterday, March 14, 2006, that Police and other government workers in the U.S. have come in contact with terrorists or people suspected of foreign terror ties more than 6,000 times in the past 28 months. In addition, she said, that there have been about 28,000 matches worldwide, many of those from U.S. diplomatic outposts that screen applicants for visas to enter the United States .
Does is seem to you that President Bush is doing all that is possible or necessary to secure our borders and to keep us safe from terrorism by enforcing immigration law? Can we trust the Senate with giving us a Guest Worker Amnesty program that is not tainted by political contributions from illegal alien employers? Can we trust that a Guest Worker Amnesty, if approved, would be adequately administered by the USCIS?
Write and call your Senators and share with them your views on Guest Worker Amnesty for 12 million illegal aliens and 200,000 known terrorists, any one of whom could have already slipped through our unprotected borders, or planning to do so.
It has been four and half years since the findings of the 9/11 Commission. Securing our borders was the number one concern of the Commission. None of its border security recommendation have been enacted much less even funded. That is why I decided to become a candidate for the California 41 st Assembly District. I need and welcome your support and contributions.
The Field Poll of September 2005 shows 81% of Californians are concerned about illegal immigration. The Field Poll of March 2006 shows 57% of registered voters and 71% of Republicans have an unfavorable view of illegal immigration. We can win this race!
Support candidates that stand for border security and immigration law enforcement at every level of government, our nation is in danger.
Tony Dolz
Candidate
California 41 st Assembly District www.dolz.com
Just obey the rules of the forum, and cut out the backstabbing, OK?
How old are we????????
You stirred the pot. Focusing on FR personalities, rather than issues and ideas and information, tends to generate flames. If one lives by the sword, one can die by the sword, despite protestations of "who, me?."
I'm leaving this conversation now to let the mods make a decision about your bad behavior.
I don't have time to waste on nonsense. Life is too good to worry about name-calling rule-breakers like you.
That reference was to a heavy metal band, I did not make it up.
This issue, to me, is the most pressing, distressing, and utterly incomprehnsible thing this gov't allows. I have seen it literally change the culture and society I, like you cherish most. However, unlike you, I do question seriously the motivations of those in DC, including the WH and the GOP.
Believe it or not, I have volunteered in many campaigns, etc etc, all for the GOP. However, that does not mean I will support what I perceive as selling out our country. It is worse since it is "our side" that is doing it, and the RATS are of course worse.
Where does that leave us??? Death by bullet in the back of the head or death by slow strangulation. I don't like being told by anyone I should be happy at least o pick my poison.
Thank you for the ping, DD!
Ok, is it the end of the world? Geez!!!
To think of the deal made of this considering the names I have been called is really telling.
Its ok to call me names, question my motives, but god forbid I respond back.
Just so as to not make anyone lose sleep, I will ignore the offended parties.
Herd em up and move them south.
Get the illegals out of our country NOW.
Somewhat heated debate and minor kidding or putdowns are commonplace and acceptable on FR. When the personal attacks get particularly vicious, nasty or violent we'll usually step in if called upon (unless there are no clean hands which is often the case).
Here is just a friendly suggestion. When you want to bring in the folks with whom you disagree on a topic, why not ping them, and pose a question or two, and ask if they have any thoughts on the topic? Then get them to say something, and then pose some more questions, or things they might consider, and before you know it, you will have maybe scored some real points, and they maybe won't even know it! Cheers.
Now I feel like an idiot. :)
I'm still leaving this thread however, since chris personally and without provocation attacked me without pinging me.......which seems to happen a lot...... and has removed himself from the list of people worth spending time with.
I took your words seriously because I'm sick of being attacked, and needing to defend what shouldn't need to be defended (my tag line). And I have recently been warned by mods when I have done nothing even close to 'vicious, nasty or violent,' but was defending my character against assault.
Sorry to bother you. I really thought that the rule against personal attacks included calling another freeper a 'clown' for no reason at all. It's not the first time I've been wrong about how things work around here..........and it certainly won't be the last.
Thanks for the forum, and the privilege of posting here...........even though the rules seem to change like the Ohio weather.....
No it's not. There are some who cry a lot. Even if you are reasonably polite, just disagreeing with them earns you a "troll" label. We just have to deal with these emotional types from time to time.
See my response above. I was unaware of that rule. Some people really need to chill out and relax. I still consider almost every freeper 10000000000000% better than most other people and don't understand why a little roughing can't be see as such.
It was not my intent to cause grief. I am guilty of a recent scathing rant directed toward MNJohnnie, for which I apologize. The note today did help us recognize that proper decorum is important. Especially when we are discussing highly charged, and polarizing issues. Since it appears that the rest of the world looks here to FR for conservative opinions. Even if we are a little divided on some views.
Get a life and learn to read, you arrogant boob.
I am FOR Tony Dolz you dolt.
Not for nothing, but it really is beneath an adult to call in a moderator rather than just politely ask to tone it down. Seriously, what are we, like 5 years old???
How about a group hug??????
"They can't take what they dish out."
This doesn't look good for Bush, McPain, or the rest of the pro-amnesty/guest worker gang.
Maybe the tide is turning? Just maybe??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.