To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
I've read the constitution a few times in my life all the way throuh and ill be damned if i can find anything in there that give the federal government the authority to protect all waterfowl.Maybe I need the special supreme court issued captian midnight decoder ring that lets people see all the astrics that are sprinkled throughtout the constitution that us ignorant serfs fail to see when we read it though.
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
38 posted on
03/15/2006 12:45:16 PM PST by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: freepatriot32
88 posted on
03/15/2006 2:01:03 PM PST by
tomswiftjr
(Remember Pearl Harbor)
To: freepatriot32
I think the rational is that since the birds are migratory, they don't fall under the jurisdiction of any particular state, and must be regulated federally. I'm not saying I completely agree, just that's where they're coming from.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson