Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: S0122017

It says it's an empty container, then there's speculation that all sorts of stuff could be used - pepper spray, smoke, crowd control agents, biological agents, chemical agents, obscurants, marking agents, dyes and inks, chaffs and flakes.

It's a catch-all statement - that's how patents are written.

Making a chemical warfare boogeyman out of this will be as successful as the attempt about 9 months ago by the European press to say the US's use of White Phosphorus projectiles and grenades amounted to chemical warfare.


4 posted on 03/15/2006 9:53:24 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sax

Regardless, it is incredibly stupid to use those terms.
You might as well patent an explosive and state that it can be use for terrorism!


8 posted on 03/15/2006 9:56:02 AM PST by S0122017 (I know something you don't know. If you know something I don't know, we can trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Sax
By that definition, every explosive ever made would be chemical warfare.
11 posted on 03/15/2006 10:02:23 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson