Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Term Limits for D.A., Assessor Voided Another Judicial Tyrany)
L A Times ^ | March 15, 2006 | Noam N. Levey

Posted on 03/15/2006 9:06:44 AM PST by radar101

Striking another blow to term limits for Los Angeles County officeholders, a judge said Tuesday she would toss out voter-approved caps on the district attorney and assessor.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Soussan Bruguera hasn't finalized her ruling, but it is all but certain that Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley and Assessor Rick Auerbach, like Sheriff Lee Baca before them, will be free to serve as many terms as they — and the voters — please.

All three officials argued that their offices, which are governed by the state Constitution, could not be limited by county voters.

Tuesday's ruling represented a rare victory for elected officials, who locally and statewide have challenged term limits almost since the movement to enact them began sweeping the nation more than a decade ago.

A lawmaker-backed initiative to loosen the 1990 limits on state legislators' terms failed four years ago

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: attornys; fraternity; judges

1 posted on 03/15/2006 9:06:50 AM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

The judge should run for office.


2 posted on 03/15/2006 9:09:20 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Would it have been better for the judge to disregard the Calif. Constitution governing ''constitutional'' officers? Local officials can be subject to local votes concerning lengths of terms and their number. Elected officials established and governed by the state constitution can be governed and limited only by amendment to that document. That clearly correct doctrine was established beyond letigitimate challenge when several states attempted to limit the number of terms their members of Congess could serve. The U.S. Constitution provides for those officials and thus states cannot interfere with the terms thereof under the Supremacy Clause. It's not a difficult or complex issue, it's really simple and a no-brainer that makes it surprising that a county would attempt the circumvention apparently done by L.A. County.


3 posted on 03/15/2006 9:16:09 AM PST by middie (ath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

CaliPorina is beyond hope.


4 posted on 03/15/2006 9:59:57 AM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Don't charter counties like L.A set these details in their local charters? I thought the argument applied to counties that choose to be governed by state law as opposed to a charter.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

5 posted on 03/15/2006 1:11:18 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson