Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oldtimer2
BRILLIANT FIND!!
Bottom line is that the Court of Review has ALREADY GIVEN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH BROAD POWERS TO CONDUCT SURVEILLANCE.

Of course, we won't hear about any of this because Russ Feingold and NBC and ABC and CBS and MSNBC and National Public Radio and CNN don't have access to National Review.

Well, either that or they don't care about the facts.

10 posted on 03/15/2006 7:34:54 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

The answer is they don't care about facts.


11 posted on 03/15/2006 7:39:45 AM PST by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper; Soul Seeker; Mo1
Remember this?

Appeals panel rejects secret court's limits on terrorist wiretaps

From Terry Frieden
CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) --The United States has broad authority to use wiretaps and other surveillance techniques to hunt for suspected terrorists, a federal appeals court panel ruled Monday.

In a 56-page opinion overturning a May decision by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the three-judge panel said the expanded wiretap guidelines sought by Attorney General John Ashcroft under the new USA Patriot Act law do not violate the Constitution. (More on the USA Patriot Act)

The ruling by the special panel from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia gives broad surveillance authority to counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism investigators to track individuals considered potential national security threats.

"Our case may well involve the most serious threat our country faces," the panel declared.

The reversal of May's decision by a federal judge represents a victory for the Justice Department and the FBI, which were harshly criticized by the lower court judge for its handling of wiretap applications, and their interpretation of the authority granted the government by the USA Patriot Act.

CNN ARCHIVES

19 posted on 03/15/2006 8:27:02 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
Bottom line is that the Court of Review has ALREADY GIVEN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH BROAD POWERS TO CONDUCT SURVEILLANCE.

They didn't give the executive branch anything. The Constitution did that, they merely upheld the Constitution.

Imagine that, a 3 judge federal court upholding the letter and the spirit of the Constitution. Now I know where that order for red long underwear with an extra hole for a third lower appendage came from back in '02.

40 posted on 03/15/2006 4:28:28 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson