Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What People Earn: How Did You Do?
Parade ^ | March 12, 2006 | Lynn Brenner

Posted on 03/14/2006 8:01:09 PM PST by stainlessbanner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Solemar
>>>>"The ones that make the big bucks in NYC, LA and other metro-centers work the equivalent of 2 or 3 full time jobs (120+ billable hours a week and 150+ overall hours). Take two or three full time jobs doing exactly what you do and you'll double or triple your salary and you'll make the big bucks as well. But don't forget to kiss your wife and kids in the 20 minutes you see them - if you remember what they look like. . . ."<<<<

I work 0600 to o dark thirty seven days a week, I am a Contractor, I cannot imagine only having 18 hrs per week off, then again I am not a Lawyer that must be able to bill clients while I sleep (Do the Math, 24 x 7 = 168 hours)

>>>"Hate lawyers all you want, just remember your hatred when you sidle up to one at the next cocktail party for some "free" advice"<<<

Free Advice? In my business they call that an Estimate or a Proposal and it comes with Hours of Research, Drawings and yes other "Free Advice" (is given freely, we don't have "chargeable hours" for every minute that we are awake, even to Lawyers who by the way are #1 on my BAD RISK list, I have more collection problems with Lawyers than any other profession)

P.S. I don't have time for cocktail parties, unless I need to find a Lawyer that owes me money.

TT
81 posted on 03/14/2006 10:49:15 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LikeLight

If the clients agree after full disclosure, obviously there is no problem. But if I need to be in court for client A, and can do work for client B during that time without adversely impacting my representation of client A, then I will. But I am not going to bill client A for time spent working on B's matter while sitting in the courthouse, otherwise doing nothing.

The point of my post was (i) to rebut the premise suggested by the poster to whom I responded that lawyers unethically double-bill their clients as a matter of course, and (ii) to inform as to the fact that highly paid lawyers work an absurd amount of hours - evidence of which is the fact that I am still at this hour checking periodically on Freep as I work.

I should have been more precise.

p.s.

"Or looking at it a little differently, accepting your premise, which client should get the free legal work?"

The one for whom you are charging a lower hourly rate! :)


82 posted on 03/14/2006 11:02:30 PM PST by Solemar ("Frognostication": The science of predicting the exact date and time that France will surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

" I am a Contractor, I cannot imagine only having 18 hrs per week off, then again I am not a Lawyer that must be able to bill clients while I sleep "

It would be nice if you were sleeping.

How about 6am to 2+am 7 days a week, 18-20 hours a day. Keep a change of clothes in the "locker" at the firm's "gym" for which you would be fired if you ever used (why aren't you billing, you're awake? - but you can shower in the morning after sleeping a couple hours in your office) I did it for several years (I opted to get out in order to actually get to know my 2 year old son). 115 days straight without a day (incl. sundays) off is really great. I sure had fun working
Christmas Eve and Christmas Day the year before last. Sure you make some money, but at the cost of your life.

Came to my senses.


83 posted on 03/14/2006 11:28:17 PM PST by Solemar ("Frognostication": The science of predicting the exact date and time that France will surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Hot Jobs In 2006 and Beyond:

Another REALLY hot job : IT Security : $$ oodles if you have experience and know what you are doing.

84 posted on 03/14/2006 11:41:02 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Islam's true face: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J169127BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

I've never made more money in my life! I work for myself, and charge $150/hr.

Then again, I am not a union stooge. I just started my own business.

If you can't make it in America, you are a loser.


85 posted on 03/15/2006 12:59:20 AM PST by MonroeDNA (Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

"Something is continuing to drive up greatly increased travel, educational and housing costs."

Foreign purchase of American assets, and everyone cashing-out their equity. That's the only thing propping up globalism. America will be a foreign-owned subsidiary soon.


86 posted on 03/15/2006 2:40:52 AM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Solemar

"Or looking at it a little differently, accepting your premise, which client should get the free legal work?"

The one for whom you are charging a lower hourly rate!"


I would have said the one you actually expect to pay you. The deadbeat lawyer comments from some probably occur because lawyers often have deadbeat clients that the lawyer took on when the client was in some dire legal crisis for little or nothing up front and got suckered into representing on a promise to pay that never pans out.


87 posted on 03/15/2006 5:54:36 AM PST by Lawdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I should have said majority. You seem to be in the minority. I just hope it is a large minority. We went to see a lawyer last week and got a speech about how bad Bush was from the turd. I still stand by Chiropractors being frauds. I just won't argue with the people who write back and claim they are not.
88 posted on 03/15/2006 6:34:18 AM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Solemar
My issue is with the ones who will twist the law and force new precedent on us because of their willingness no bastardize the law. They have subverted the intention of so much of our legal code. These are the same people who give us the phony wall of separation, abortion and constitutional right of prisoners to have cable.
89 posted on 03/15/2006 6:38:33 AM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: calljack

I have always believed that if the chiropractor really works, you wouldn't have to "see him" for 20 years. I've always had issues with these people. I know some people swear by them but they have to go back for the rest of their lives and there just seems to be something wrong with that (at least to me).


90 posted on 03/15/2006 6:38:57 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

I think the reality of most people living better than before has a lot more to do with huge debt than actually doing better. I know many people that right now are about one month's pay away from total ruin, and I don't think people used to live that way - my parents certainly didn't.

Everything looks good on the outside but if you were to examine it closely, you'd find a virtual house of cards.


91 posted on 03/15/2006 6:42:02 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
OMG, that is hilarious. Between his post and your reply, I haven't had a bellyaching laugh like that in a long time. /tears of laughter/

I always try to contain my laughter at work (when I read a funny post on FR), but this time I couldn't.

Larry, I think you just came up with the funniest Seinfeld reference ever. I'll be thinking of your reply next time I see that episode.

I just hope he doesn't think of slippin' his boss a "Micky."

92 posted on 03/15/2006 6:44:44 AM PST by MotleyGirl70 (Most cats are democrats - did you ever meet a creature with such an inborn sense of entitlement?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Hunble; Cagey; Larry Lucido
To be honest, I have no idea if I am even being paid!

JERRY: How much are they payin' you?

KRAMER: Oh, no, no, no-no--I don't want any pay. I'm doin' this just for me.

JERRY: Really. So uh, what do you do down there all day?

KRAMER: T.C.B. You know, takin' care o' business. Aa--I gotta go.

JERRY: All right.

KRAMER: I'll see you tonight, huh? Forget my briefcase.

JERRY: W-w-wha' you got in there?

KRAMER: Crackers.

93 posted on 03/15/2006 6:52:59 AM PST by MotleyGirl70 (Most cats are democrats - did you ever meet a creature with such an inborn sense of entitlement?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: calljack

Osteopathic physicians learn many of the same skills that Chiropractors use and most people wouldn't know the difference between them and an Allopathic physician. Adjustments and manipulation are legitimate, but many chiropractors use other stuff that is kind of wierd. The important thing is that they give you some improvement.


94 posted on 03/15/2006 6:55:37 AM PST by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: danmar
You ought to be kidding me...$481 a week for actors?!...me thinks it is more like $481 a minute.

For most "actors" it is simply code for "waitress". The few that do make it increase this number dramatically.

95 posted on 03/15/2006 7:00:04 AM PST by usapatriot28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: LikeLight
If the first client has agreed to pay the lawyer for time spent waiting in court, and the second client has agreed to pay the lawyer for time spent working on the document, how is it fraud? Both clients get exactly what they paid for. Neither is overcharged. The lawyer is compensated well.

This is called double billing and is both illegal and unethical (“It goes without saying that a lawyer who has undertaken to bill on an hourly basis is never justified in charging a client for hours not actually expended.” ABA Formal Opinion 93-379, at p. 7. You can't ethically expend two hours in one hour You are either working on behalf of one client or the other.) There is actually a notorious case about this...a lawyer who would bill in excess of 24hrs a day, on the theory that he was working on other matters while traveling in a plane cross country.

Now days, most large clients use computer billing systems, and regular audits. It is very easy to get caught doing this, and the consequences are unpleasant.

Heck, some of my client's billing systems will not allow me to enter more than 12hrs a day in time without a special waiver.

96 posted on 03/15/2006 7:11:58 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Solemar

Thanks for the further explanation. I think we're on the same page.


97 posted on 03/15/2006 7:16:49 AM PST by LikeLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: speedy
Why does everyone think that lawyers are all rich?

I graduated top 10 in my class and came out making $40K/yr with $50K in debt, because I chose not to work at a sweat shop that pays the salaries that skews the numbers in the first place.

BTW, in a typical big firm, of an incoming class of 15 associates, 3 may (stick around to) make partner, and of those 3, one may actually be an "equity" partner.

98 posted on 03/15/2006 7:17:14 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt
...for hours not actually expended...

Isn't that the critical distinction?

99 posted on 03/15/2006 7:24:04 AM PST by LikeLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: LikeLight
Yes...and double billing is defined as billing 2 clients for the same portion of the workday. You can't, ethically, spend the same hour working, i.e., billing for client A as well as client B.

And yes, I know that it is done...but not nearly to the extent that people think. Like I said, clients have become very viligant in reviewing their bills and conducting audits.

Besides, most firms cap the amount of hours an attorney can bill in one year. At my firm, you can only (LOL) bill 3000 hours in a year (although the real "cap" is about 2500-2800). Anything over that number screams fraud.

100 posted on 03/15/2006 7:34:05 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson