Bush-bashing Trumps Ideas for Democrats

NewsMax ^ | March 14, 2006 | David Limbaugh

[Kaslin]

The famous quote by Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré, comes to mind Democrats are "Stuck on stupid"

[Herford Turley]

Didn't Kerry and Edwards say, "We can do better?" I wonder how that turned out.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Democrat party ideas - Republicans can argue with.

But heck, Bush bashing is all the rage that the whole family can join in on. And is. Who can argue with trashing?

[Mogollon]

A majority party no more. (Zell Miller at the 2004 Republican Convention)

[Mogollon]

A majority party no more. (Zell Miller at the 2004 Republican Convention)

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

[Their platitude, "We can do better," is not likely to fool enough voters...]

It did in 1992, but only with that psychotic and Napoleonic Busahaphobe Perot's help.

[txroadhawg]

Someone needs to tell these fools, Bush isn't running this goround. Better yet, don't tell them.
Can't you just see the look of surprise on there faces?

[tiki]

I did notice that the Dims on the news programs are as shrill as ever and that makes the Republicans seem even more reasonable than ever.

[COEXERJ145]

[BARLF]

Some woman on Hannity and Combs show tonight said Bush is a lame duck.
Ha!

[adorno]

Well, you can't blame the democrats for using that tactic of "the plan is coming".

If they actually released a plan by which they could be judged, they know that immediately they too would be judged. If they don't have to be judged, then the only people that can be judged are the ones in power. Therefore, it's a lot easier to bash Bush and the republicans, who for the most part are setting the agenda. If the democrats were to have to explain an agenda, then Bush's numbers and the republicans numbers would automatically go up.

Eventually the democrats will have to disclose an agenda before the elections. Then they won't be able to just bash Bush and the republicans. They'll have to defend and explain their beliefs and agenda. There's no way that their agenda will be able to stand up to scrutiny. It's a lot easier to criticize than to actually perform.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Let us see now. The Libby trial isn't looking so good for the Dems and it turns out that they did know Jack. Peter Paul is moving forward in his suit. Just to name a few things.

On the other hand the Justice Department is actually investigating leaks of classified information, threatening to prosecute reporters and the President has authorized the release of those Iraqi documents seized during the initial push into Baghdad. If Stephen Hayes is correct these documents attest to the fact, among other things, that Saddam did in fact have a nuclear program going and did have WMDs up until only months before the invasion.

As we used to say on the diamond. Ducks are on the pond. W is at bat. Wouldn't be a bad time to go yard.

[encm(ss)]

Plan? We don't need no stinkin' Plan!

[P-40]

Someone needs to tell these fools, Bush isn't running this goround.

I think they are still on that "Bush was selected, not elected" thing so he is eligible to serve another term or two. :)

[Democratshavenobrains]

The Democrats are happy to make the WOT solely about Bin Laden.

[petercooper]

bttt

[California Patriot]

The Rats can win without ideas. For us, it's a riskier proposition.

[Once-Ler]

the President has authorized the release of those Iraqi documents seized during the initial push into Baghdad. If Stephen Hayes is correct these documents attest to the fact, among other things, that Saddam did in fact have a nuclear program going and did have WMDs up until only months before the invasion.

Oh Boy, is this great!!!

[Once-Ler]

The Rats can win without ideas.

Not when the economy is good...and fortuntely the GOP has co-opted all the popular positions.

[eric_da_grate]

Now, THIS is a terrific read.

Nice catch.