[CharlesWayneCT]

This thread was a discussion about whether the program was meeting its goals. My point was that the program WAS doing what it was intended to do.

A previous post I felt misrepresented my defense of the program's operation as aquiescense to it's existance, and I was simply trying to disavow such a link.

I could be against the war in Iraq, and still defend HOW the war was being fought. Is that a better analogy?

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>This thread was a discussion about whether the program was meeting its goals.

Conservatives would say, the program should not exist. Period. You're digging yourself into a deeper hole. You've been here long enough to know that parsing your remarks, is a tactic that liberals use. Not conservatives. Stay away from the analogies, they don't work well.