To: Filo
Were you neutral on the topic of the origin of life but, through study, examination of evidence and rational extrapolation, were compelled to a belief in interspecies evolution forced by the preponderance and sheer exclusivity of that evidence?
![](http://home.hiwaay.net/~wterrell/william.gif)
548 posted on
03/16/2006 6:43:19 AM PST by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: William Terrell
Were you neutral on the topic of the origin of life but, through study, examination of evidence and rational extrapolation, were compelled to a belief in interspecies evolution forced by the preponderance and sheer exclusivity of that evidence?
I'm not quite sure we both have the same definition for "interspecies evolution" but I do believe that species evolved from other species (i.e. that a group of members from one species diverged from the "main line" of that species and eventually lost the ability to interbreed with them.)
Those branches in the evolutionary tree are both obvious and well documented so yes, I was "compelled to a belief in interspecies evolution forced by the preponderance and sheer exclusivity of that evidence."
While there is plenty of room for clarification of details, the concept that species evolved from prior species is clear to me and others who actually studied this - especially those who make it their life's work.
The only alternative is some form of mysticism, of which ID is only one example.
550 posted on
03/16/2006 8:09:02 AM PST by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson