To: GLDNGUN
Start with the fact that what we call "the fossil record" is one tiny pinpoint in a vast sea of data, most of which has vanished and the rest of which hasn't been found. A pinpoint. For anyone to assume the so-called fossil record can tell us anything on this issue is the ultimate in hubris.
To: firebrand
For anyone to assume the so-called fossil record can tell us anything on this issue is the ultimate in hubris. Thanks. I'll have to use that next time a Darweiner tries to use a fossil as evidence. :-)
55 posted on
03/14/2006 2:11:49 PM PST by
GLDNGUN
To: firebrand
It's weird how the mind will make things up to support a clearly refuted theory. I know you believe it, but your dark side is persuading you.
316 posted on
03/14/2006 8:59:39 PM PST by
fabian
To: firebrand
"the fossil record...a vast sea of data, most of which has vanished and the rest of which hasn't been found." I know, I know, and it's so unfair. It puts us at such a disadvantage.
509 posted on
03/15/2006 6:10:03 PM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
(It's like trying to imagine a headless hammer without a handle.)
To: firebrand
How about recent finds such as some fish, and most recently a species of rat that was thought to have gone extinct some 11 million years ago? The amount of evolutionary change in said rat in the last 11 million years?.....NONE!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson